Recent developments in the study of brain functional connectivity are widely based on graph theory. In the current analysis of brain networks, there is no unique way to derive the adjacency matrix, which is a useful representation for a graph. Its entries, containing information about the existence of links, are identified by thresholding the correlation between the time series that characterized the dynamic behavior of the nodes. In this work, we put forward a strategy to choose a suitable threshold on the correlation matrix considering the problem of multiple comparisons in order to control the error rates. In this context we propose to control the positive false discovery rate (pFDR) and a similar measure involving false negatives, called the positive false nondiscovery rate (pFNR). In particular, we provide point and interval estimators for pFNR and a method for balancing the two types of error, demonstrating it by using functional magnetic resonance imaging data and Monte Carlo simulations.
Sala, S., Quatto, P., Valsasina, P., Agosta, F., Filippi, M. (2014). pFDR and pFNR estimation for brain networks construction. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 33(1), 158-169 [10.1002/sim.5918].
pFDR and pFNR estimation for brain networks construction
QUATTO, PIERO;
2014
Abstract
Recent developments in the study of brain functional connectivity are widely based on graph theory. In the current analysis of brain networks, there is no unique way to derive the adjacency matrix, which is a useful representation for a graph. Its entries, containing information about the existence of links, are identified by thresholding the correlation between the time series that characterized the dynamic behavior of the nodes. In this work, we put forward a strategy to choose a suitable threshold on the correlation matrix considering the problem of multiple comparisons in order to control the error rates. In this context we propose to control the positive false discovery rate (pFDR) and a similar measure involving false negatives, called the positive false nondiscovery rate (pFNR). In particular, we provide point and interval estimators for pFNR and a method for balancing the two types of error, demonstrating it by using functional magnetic resonance imaging data and Monte Carlo simulations.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.