OBJECTIVE: In Italian nursing homes (NHs), care delivery at night and during holidays is not regulated by regional laws; some facilities employ staff physicians, others employ physicians engaged from year to year (temporary physicians), and others employ publicly funded National Health System (NHS) physicians. This study was designed to determine whether the use of different kinds of physicians leads to different outcomes with regard to the rate of hospitalization and appropriateness of the management of adverse clinical events. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized-survey data collection. SETTING: Ten nonprofit nursing facilities in Italy. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and fifty-two NH residents, staff physicians, temporary physicians, and NHS physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Medical intervention during adverse clinical events occurring at night and during holidays. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-two residents experienced 551 adverse clinical events; 78 were hospitalized. The hospitalization rate of NHS physicians was about two times that of the temporary physicians and six times that of the staff physicians. Staff physicians' diagnoses and management were appropriate in the majority of cases; NHS diagnosis and management were doubtful or incorrect in about one-third of all cases. CONCLUSIONS: NH residents frequently experience adverse clinical events; physician characteristics influence the rate of hospitalization and the quality of medical interventions.

Bellelli, G., Frisoni, G., Barbisoni, P., Boffelli, S., Rozzini, R., Trabucchi, M. (2001). The Management of Adverse Clinical Events in Nursing Homes: A 1-Year Survey Study. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 49(7), 915-925 [10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49182.x].

The Management of Adverse Clinical Events in Nursing Homes: A 1-Year Survey Study

BELLELLI, GIUSEPPE;
2001

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In Italian nursing homes (NHs), care delivery at night and during holidays is not regulated by regional laws; some facilities employ staff physicians, others employ physicians engaged from year to year (temporary physicians), and others employ publicly funded National Health System (NHS) physicians. This study was designed to determine whether the use of different kinds of physicians leads to different outcomes with regard to the rate of hospitalization and appropriateness of the management of adverse clinical events. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized-survey data collection. SETTING: Ten nonprofit nursing facilities in Italy. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and fifty-two NH residents, staff physicians, temporary physicians, and NHS physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Medical intervention during adverse clinical events occurring at night and during holidays. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-two residents experienced 551 adverse clinical events; 78 were hospitalized. The hospitalization rate of NHS physicians was about two times that of the temporary physicians and six times that of the staff physicians. Staff physicians' diagnoses and management were appropriate in the majority of cases; NHS diagnosis and management were doubtful or incorrect in about one-third of all cases. CONCLUSIONS: NH residents frequently experience adverse clinical events; physician characteristics influence the rate of hospitalization and the quality of medical interventions.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Appropriateness; Hospital transfer; Nursing home; Physician
English
2001
49
7
915
925
reserved
Bellelli, G., Frisoni, G., Barbisoni, P., Boffelli, S., Rozzini, R., Trabucchi, M. (2001). The Management of Adverse Clinical Events in Nursing Homes: A 1-Year Survey Study. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 49(7), 915-925 [10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49182.x].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
N 9.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Dimensione 84.1 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
84.1 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/47050
Citazioni
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
Social impact