In this paper, after reviewing the Enlightenment-inherited liberal aporia of rhetoric and violence, I build on Aune's work to critically explore the nexus of rhetoric/violence through Gramsci's political theory. Whereas Aune's (20 11) reflections on symbolic violence and ideology provide a first needed problematization of the subject, I claim that hegemony, compared to ideology, is more adequate to articulate the tension inhabiting the rhetoric/violence relationship. That is the indissoluble link of force and consent inherent in the practice of social struggle.
Briziarelli, M. (2014). Provocation: “Forcing” and “Consenting” Social Struggle: Reflections on Rhetoric and Jacobinism. ARGUMENTATION AND ADVOCACY, 50(4), 273-277 [10.1080/00028533.2014.11821829].
Provocation: “Forcing” and “Consenting” Social Struggle: Reflections on Rhetoric and Jacobinism
Briziarelli, M
2014
Abstract
In this paper, after reviewing the Enlightenment-inherited liberal aporia of rhetoric and violence, I build on Aune's work to critically explore the nexus of rhetoric/violence through Gramsci's political theory. Whereas Aune's (20 11) reflections on symbolic violence and ideology provide a first needed problematization of the subject, I claim that hegemony, compared to ideology, is more adequate to articulate the tension inhabiting the rhetoric/violence relationship. That is the indissoluble link of force and consent inherent in the practice of social struggle.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Briziarelli-2014-Argumentat Advoc-VoR.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
549.71 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
549.71 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.