Sometimes the literary fortune of a book can almost be unfortunate. We think this is the case of Guy Debord’sSociety of the Spectacle, which on the one hand succeeded where most of our scholarship concerned with the production of critical knowledge tends to fail, by going beyond the constraining walls of academic discourse and inspiring human emancipation. On the other hand, while the idea of the Spectacle has infiltrated the collective imagery, it has most frequently done so through the popularization of its most glaring surface, thus limiting its overall significance.
Briziarelli, M., Armano, E. (2017). Introduction. From the Notion of Spectacle to Spectacle 2.0: The Dialectic of Capitalist Mediations. In M. Briziarelli, E. Armano (a cura di), The Spectacle 2.0: Reading Debord in the Context of Digital Capitalism (pp. 15-48). London : University of Westminster Press.
Introduction. From the Notion of Spectacle to Spectacle 2.0: The Dialectic of Capitalist Mediations
Briziarelli M;
2017
Abstract
Sometimes the literary fortune of a book can almost be unfortunate. We think this is the case of Guy Debord’sSociety of the Spectacle, which on the one hand succeeded where most of our scholarship concerned with the production of critical knowledge tends to fail, by going beyond the constraining walls of academic discourse and inspiring human emancipation. On the other hand, while the idea of the Spectacle has infiltrated the collective imagery, it has most frequently done so through the popularization of its most glaring surface, thus limiting its overall significance.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Briziarelli-2017-The Spectacle 2.0-The Spectacle 2.0-VoR.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Creative Commons
Dimensione
4.5 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.5 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.