The goal of this paper is to revisit the media theory-informed framework originally advanced by Debord’s Society of the Spectacle in order to acknowledge the changes implied by the shift to a post-fordist information and knowledge driven capitalism. We use the Debordian theory as a lens through which we critically explore both the subjective and objective conditions of precarious labor. More specifically, we will make reference to the concrete setting of informational/knowledge labor in Turin by reporting excerpts of interviews with professionals and their precarious conditions. That will provide an empirical engagement with the subjectivities inhabiting what we define as the Spectacle of precarization, a condition of labor mediated by current information and communication technologies that describes precarity as being characterized by the tensions between autonomy and exploitation, informality and stable structures of value creation. We claim that the notion of Spectacle contributes to explain how informational capitalism produces precarity by creating both a stable system of representation for collectively shared meanings and practices of knowledge working, at the same time, producing a scenario that systematically places its actors in a dependable condition of impermanence.

Briziarelli, M., Armano, E. (2017). Spectacular Precarity the Condition of Knowledge Workers in the Context of Informational Capitalism. In B. Heidkamp, D. Kergel (a cura di), Precarity within the Digital Age Media Change and Social Insecurity (pp. 81-98). Springer [10.1007/978-3-658-17678-5_5].

Spectacular Precarity the Condition of Knowledge Workers in the Context of Informational Capitalism

Briziarelli, M
;
2017

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to revisit the media theory-informed framework originally advanced by Debord’s Society of the Spectacle in order to acknowledge the changes implied by the shift to a post-fordist information and knowledge driven capitalism. We use the Debordian theory as a lens through which we critically explore both the subjective and objective conditions of precarious labor. More specifically, we will make reference to the concrete setting of informational/knowledge labor in Turin by reporting excerpts of interviews with professionals and their precarious conditions. That will provide an empirical engagement with the subjectivities inhabiting what we define as the Spectacle of precarization, a condition of labor mediated by current information and communication technologies that describes precarity as being characterized by the tensions between autonomy and exploitation, informality and stable structures of value creation. We claim that the notion of Spectacle contributes to explain how informational capitalism produces precarity by creating both a stable system of representation for collectively shared meanings and practices of knowledge working, at the same time, producing a scenario that systematically places its actors in a dependable condition of impermanence.
Capitolo o saggio
Knowledge work; Precarization; Spectacle; Informality; Informational capitalism
English
Precarity within the Digital Age Media Change and Social Insecurity
Heidkamp, B; Kergel, D
2017
9783658176778
Springer
81
98
Briziarelli, M., Armano, E. (2017). Spectacular Precarity the Condition of Knowledge Workers in the Context of Informational Capitalism. In B. Heidkamp, D. Kergel (a cura di), Precarity within the Digital Age Media Change and Social Insecurity (pp. 81-98). Springer [10.1007/978-3-658-17678-5_5].
reserved
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Briziarelli-2017-Spectacular Precarity-VoR.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 123.2 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
123.2 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/457719
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
Social impact