This article explores the politicisation of cultural heritage during the aftermath of the 1980 earthquake in Naples and the 2009 earthquake in LAquila. It begins by critically addressing the positions of Tomaso Montanari and Salvatore Settis, two prominent heritage intellectuals at the forefront of national campaigns to restore the damaged historic centre of LAquila. Both have been instrumental in shaping an oppositional heritage discourse in Italy that underscores the civic virtues of the nations cultural patrimony while simultaneously railing against its marketisation. Reflecting upon observations in LAquila, where locals involved in protests at government inaction have been scolded by fellow inhabitants for their lack of obeisance to cultural heritage, and drawing on longstanding ethnographic research in Naples, where heritage campaigns against redevelopment in the historic centre in the 1980s were later incorporated into an ambitious regeneration agenda, the article argues that this oppositional heritage discourse is not only premised upon idealist notions of collective identity but also, as a result of its attempts to legislate the boundaries of heritage citizenship and its disavowal of philologically incorrect relationships with historic centres, it ultimately provides tacit support to the very same neoliberal urban processes against which it claims to take a stand.

Dines, N. (2016). Ethnographic reflections on oppositional heritage discourse in two post-earthquake Italian cities. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HERITAGE STUDIES, 22(2), 102-116 [10.1080/13527258.2015.1053401].

Ethnographic reflections on oppositional heritage discourse in two post-earthquake Italian cities

Dines, N
2016

Abstract

This article explores the politicisation of cultural heritage during the aftermath of the 1980 earthquake in Naples and the 2009 earthquake in LAquila. It begins by critically addressing the positions of Tomaso Montanari and Salvatore Settis, two prominent heritage intellectuals at the forefront of national campaigns to restore the damaged historic centre of LAquila. Both have been instrumental in shaping an oppositional heritage discourse in Italy that underscores the civic virtues of the nations cultural patrimony while simultaneously railing against its marketisation. Reflecting upon observations in LAquila, where locals involved in protests at government inaction have been scolded by fellow inhabitants for their lack of obeisance to cultural heritage, and drawing on longstanding ethnographic research in Naples, where heritage campaigns against redevelopment in the historic centre in the 1980s were later incorporated into an ambitious regeneration agenda, the article argues that this oppositional heritage discourse is not only premised upon idealist notions of collective identity but also, as a result of its attempts to legislate the boundaries of heritage citizenship and its disavowal of philologically incorrect relationships with historic centres, it ultimately provides tacit support to the very same neoliberal urban processes against which it claims to take a stand.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
historic centres; Italy; neoliberal urbanisation; oppositional heritage discourse; post-earthquake reconstruction;
English
2016
22
2
102
116
reserved
Dines, N. (2016). Ethnographic reflections on oppositional heritage discourse in two post-earthquake Italian cities. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HERITAGE STUDIES, 22(2), 102-116 [10.1080/13527258.2015.1053401].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Dines-2016-IJHS-VoR.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 378.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
378.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/456404
Citazioni
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
Social impact