Idiom comprehension in 15 aphasic patients was assessed with three tasks: a sentence-to-picture matching task, a sentence-to-word matching task and an oral definition task. The results of all three tasks showed that the idiom comprehension in aphasic patients was impaired compared to that of the control group, and was significantly affected by the type of task and type of idiom. Whilst performance on the oral definition and sentence-to-picture matching tasks was similarly impaired, the patients performed significantly better on the sentence-to-word matching task. The results confirm the relevance of task and idiom type in drawing conclusions about figurative language interpretation in brain-damaged patients. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Papagno, C., Caporali, A. (2007). Testing idiom comprehension in aphasic patients: The effects of task and idiom type. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 100(2), 208-220 [10.1016/j.bandl.2006.01.002].

Testing idiom comprehension in aphasic patients: The effects of task and idiom type

PAPAGNO, COSTANZA;
2007

Abstract

Idiom comprehension in 15 aphasic patients was assessed with three tasks: a sentence-to-picture matching task, a sentence-to-word matching task and an oral definition task. The results of all three tasks showed that the idiom comprehension in aphasic patients was impaired compared to that of the control group, and was significantly affected by the type of task and type of idiom. Whilst performance on the oral definition and sentence-to-picture matching tasks was similarly impaired, the patients performed significantly better on the sentence-to-word matching task. The results confirm the relevance of task and idiom type in drawing conclusions about figurative language interpretation in brain-damaged patients. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
aphasia; idiom; executive functions
English
2007
100
2
208
220
none
Papagno, C., Caporali, A. (2007). Testing idiom comprehension in aphasic patients: The effects of task and idiom type. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 100(2), 208-220 [10.1016/j.bandl.2006.01.002].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/452
Citazioni
  • Scopus 50
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
Social impact