Maintenance therapy is emerging as a treatment strategy in the management of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Initial trials addressing the question of duration of combination chemotherapy failed to show any overall survival benefit for the prolonged administration over a fixed number of cycles with an increased risk for cumulative toxicity. Nowadays several agents with different ways of administration and a different pattern of toxicity have been formally investigated in the maintenance setting. Maintenance strategies include continuing with an agent already present in the induction regimen or switching to a different one. Taking into consideration that no comparative trials of maintenance with different chemotherapy drugs or targeted agents have been conducted, the choice and the duration of maintenance agents is largely empirical. Furthermore, it is still unknown and it remains an open question if this approach needs to be proposed to every patient in the case of partial/complete response or stable disease after the induction therapy. Here, we critically review available data on maintenance treatment, discussing the possibility to tailor the right treatment to the right patient, in an attempt to optimize costs and benefits of an ever-growing panel of different treatment options.

Novello, S., Milella, M., Tiseo, M., Banna, G., Cortinovis, D., Di Maio, M., et al. (2011). Maintenance therapy in NSCLC: why? To whom? Which agent?. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 30(1) [10.1186/1756-9966-30-50].

Maintenance therapy in NSCLC: why? To whom? Which agent?

Cortinovis, D;
2011

Abstract

Maintenance therapy is emerging as a treatment strategy in the management of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Initial trials addressing the question of duration of combination chemotherapy failed to show any overall survival benefit for the prolonged administration over a fixed number of cycles with an increased risk for cumulative toxicity. Nowadays several agents with different ways of administration and a different pattern of toxicity have been formally investigated in the maintenance setting. Maintenance strategies include continuing with an agent already present in the induction regimen or switching to a different one. Taking into consideration that no comparative trials of maintenance with different chemotherapy drugs or targeted agents have been conducted, the choice and the duration of maintenance agents is largely empirical. Furthermore, it is still unknown and it remains an open question if this approach needs to be proposed to every patient in the case of partial/complete response or stable disease after the induction therapy. Here, we critically review available data on maintenance treatment, discussing the possibility to tailor the right treatment to the right patient, in an attempt to optimize costs and benefits of an ever-growing panel of different treatment options.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Lung Neoplasms
English
2011
30
1
50
open
Novello, S., Milella, M., Tiseo, M., Banna, G., Cortinovis, D., Di Maio, M., et al. (2011). Maintenance therapy in NSCLC: why? To whom? Which agent?. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 30(1) [10.1186/1756-9966-30-50].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Novello-2011-J Experim Clin Cancer Res-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Review
Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 167.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
167.59 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/450711
Citazioni
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
Social impact