Objective: As the literature on conventional cri- teria for discriminating early-onset (EO) from late-onset (LO) Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is sparse and controversial, the aim of this study was to establish a precise age at onset (AAO) criterion, by using a specific statistical proce- dure, and to describe the clinical characteristics of the two sub-groups. Methods: Admixture analysis was performed to establish the AAO cut-off in a multi-center study including 2000 AD patients consecutively recruited in eight Italian Memory Clinics. None of the patients were tak- ing acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, antipsychotic or anti-depressant drugs. At the first diagnostic visit, they were administered the Mini Mental State Examination, the Basic and Instrumental Activi- ties of Daily Living and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory to assess clinical phenomenology. Results: Using a specific statistical procedure, we established that AAO that discriminated EO- from LO-AD was 66. Compared with the LO-AD group, the EO-AD group showed longer duration of illness and a higher educational level as well as less severe functional impairment and delu- sions. Conclusions: Differences in sociodemo- graphic and clinical characteristics, such as duration of illness, education and delusion se-verity, suggested the involvement of different pathogenic processes. Additional studies are needed to further investigate the mechanisms underlying the disorder in the two sub-groups of AD patients.

Spalletta, G., De Luca, V., Padovani, A., Rozzini, L., Perri, R., Bruni, A., et al. (2013). Early onset versus late onset in Alzheimer’s disease: What is the reliable cut-off?. ADVANCES IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, 02(01), 40-47 [10.4236/aad.2013.21005].

Early onset versus late onset in Alzheimer’s disease: What is the reliable cut-off?

BELLELLI, GIUSEPPE;
2013

Abstract

Objective: As the literature on conventional cri- teria for discriminating early-onset (EO) from late-onset (LO) Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is sparse and controversial, the aim of this study was to establish a precise age at onset (AAO) criterion, by using a specific statistical proce- dure, and to describe the clinical characteristics of the two sub-groups. Methods: Admixture analysis was performed to establish the AAO cut-off in a multi-center study including 2000 AD patients consecutively recruited in eight Italian Memory Clinics. None of the patients were tak- ing acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, antipsychotic or anti-depressant drugs. At the first diagnostic visit, they were administered the Mini Mental State Examination, the Basic and Instrumental Activi- ties of Daily Living and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory to assess clinical phenomenology. Results: Using a specific statistical procedure, we established that AAO that discriminated EO- from LO-AD was 66. Compared with the LO-AD group, the EO-AD group showed longer duration of illness and a higher educational level as well as less severe functional impairment and delu- sions. Conclusions: Differences in sociodemo- graphic and clinical characteristics, such as duration of illness, education and delusion se-verity, suggested the involvement of different pathogenic processes. Additional studies are needed to further investigate the mechanisms underlying the disorder in the two sub-groups of AD patients.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Alzheimer’s Disease; Onset; Neuropsychiatric Symptoms; Admixture Analysis; Pathogenesis; Cognitive Reserve
English
2013
02
01
40
47
open
Spalletta, G., De Luca, V., Padovani, A., Rozzini, L., Perri, R., Bruni, A., et al. (2013). Early onset versus late onset in Alzheimer’s disease: What is the reliable cut-off?. ADVANCES IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, 02(01), 40-47 [10.4236/aad.2013.21005].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Spalletta AAD 2013.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 209.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
209.84 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/42554
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact