Objective: As the literature on conventional cri- teria for discriminating early-onset (EO) from late-onset (LO) Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is sparse and controversial, the aim of this study was to establish a precise age at onset (AAO) criterion, by using a specific statistical proce- dure, and to describe the clinical characteristics of the two sub-groups. Methods: Admixture analysis was performed to establish the AAO cut-off in a multi-center study including 2000 AD patients consecutively recruited in eight Italian Memory Clinics. None of the patients were tak- ing acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, antipsychotic or anti-depressant drugs. At the first diagnostic visit, they were administered the Mini Mental State Examination, the Basic and Instrumental Activi- ties of Daily Living and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory to assess clinical phenomenology. Results: Using a specific statistical procedure, we established that AAO that discriminated EO- from LO-AD was 66. Compared with the LO-AD group, the EO-AD group showed longer duration of illness and a higher educational level as well as less severe functional impairment and delu- sions. Conclusions: Differences in sociodemo- graphic and clinical characteristics, such as duration of illness, education and delusion se-verity, suggested the involvement of different pathogenic processes. Additional studies are needed to further investigate the mechanisms underlying the disorder in the two sub-groups of AD patients.

Spalletta, G., De Luca, V., Padovani, A., Rozzini, L., Perri, R., Bruni, A., et al. (2013). Early onset versus late onset in Alzheimer’s disease: What is the reliable cut-off?. ADVANCES IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, 02(01), 40-47 [10.4236/aad.2013.21005].

Early onset versus late onset in Alzheimer’s disease: What is the reliable cut-off?

BELLELLI, GIUSEPPE;
2013

Abstract

Objective: As the literature on conventional cri- teria for discriminating early-onset (EO) from late-onset (LO) Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is sparse and controversial, the aim of this study was to establish a precise age at onset (AAO) criterion, by using a specific statistical proce- dure, and to describe the clinical characteristics of the two sub-groups. Methods: Admixture analysis was performed to establish the AAO cut-off in a multi-center study including 2000 AD patients consecutively recruited in eight Italian Memory Clinics. None of the patients were tak- ing acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, antipsychotic or anti-depressant drugs. At the first diagnostic visit, they were administered the Mini Mental State Examination, the Basic and Instrumental Activi- ties of Daily Living and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory to assess clinical phenomenology. Results: Using a specific statistical procedure, we established that AAO that discriminated EO- from LO-AD was 66. Compared with the LO-AD group, the EO-AD group showed longer duration of illness and a higher educational level as well as less severe functional impairment and delu- sions. Conclusions: Differences in sociodemo- graphic and clinical characteristics, such as duration of illness, education and delusion se-verity, suggested the involvement of different pathogenic processes. Additional studies are needed to further investigate the mechanisms underlying the disorder in the two sub-groups of AD patients.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Alzheimer’s Disease; Onset; Neuropsychiatric Symptoms; Admixture Analysis; Pathogenesis; Cognitive Reserve
English
2013
40
47
8
Spalletta, G., De Luca, V., Padovani, A., Rozzini, L., Perri, R., Bruni, A., et al. (2013). Early onset versus late onset in Alzheimer’s disease: What is the reliable cut-off?. ADVANCES IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, 02(01), 40-47 [10.4236/aad.2013.21005].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Spalletta AAD 2013.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 209.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
209.84 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/42554
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact