Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnoea is an increasingly prevalent clinical condition with significant impact on individuals and public health. Continuous positive airway pressure therapy is the standard treatment, but adherence is limited and alternative treatments are needed. In this context, non-invasive and invasive methods for the electrical stimulation of upper airway dilator muscles have been demonstrated to be effective in selected patients. Areas covered: This review will cover investigations on the clinical effects, safety, and tolerability of non-invasive and invasive electrical stimulation of the upper airway for the management of obstructive sleep apnoea. Following a search of the relevant literature published on PubMed this review is focused mainly on data obtained from randomized clinical trials and clinical studies. Expert commentary: The available evidence provides a rationale to consider upper airway electrical stimulation as treatment for selected patients with obstructive sleep apnoea, who have poor adherence or experience difficulties with continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Non-invasive stimulation using transcutaneous electrodes and implantable hypoglossal nerve stimulator technologies may provide an alternative to continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea via restoration of neuromuscular tone and improved upper airway patency.

Bisogni, V., Pengo, M., De Vito, A., Maiolino, G., Rossi, G., Moxham, J., et al. (2017). Electrical stimulation for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea: a review of the evidence. EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 11(9), 711-720 [10.1080/17476348.2017.1358619].

Electrical stimulation for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea: a review of the evidence

Pengo M;
2017

Abstract

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnoea is an increasingly prevalent clinical condition with significant impact on individuals and public health. Continuous positive airway pressure therapy is the standard treatment, but adherence is limited and alternative treatments are needed. In this context, non-invasive and invasive methods for the electrical stimulation of upper airway dilator muscles have been demonstrated to be effective in selected patients. Areas covered: This review will cover investigations on the clinical effects, safety, and tolerability of non-invasive and invasive electrical stimulation of the upper airway for the management of obstructive sleep apnoea. Following a search of the relevant literature published on PubMed this review is focused mainly on data obtained from randomized clinical trials and clinical studies. Expert commentary: The available evidence provides a rationale to consider upper airway electrical stimulation as treatment for selected patients with obstructive sleep apnoea, who have poor adherence or experience difficulties with continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Non-invasive stimulation using transcutaneous electrodes and implantable hypoglossal nerve stimulator technologies may provide an alternative to continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea via restoration of neuromuscular tone and improved upper airway patency.
Articolo in rivista - Review Essay
genioglossus muscle; hypoglossal nerve stimulation; implantable stimulation technologies; Obstructive sleep apnoea; transcutaneous electrical stimulation; upper airway patency;
English
2017
11
9
711
720
none
Bisogni, V., Pengo, M., De Vito, A., Maiolino, G., Rossi, G., Moxham, J., et al. (2017). Electrical stimulation for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea: a review of the evidence. EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 11(9), 711-720 [10.1080/17476348.2017.1358619].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/423839
Citazioni
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
Social impact