Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious cardiac condition, which includes a wide range of clinical presentations, with varying degrees of severity. The diagnosis is multifactorial and a proper characterization of disease requires the identification of the primary site of infection (usually the cardiac valve) and the search of secondary systemic complications. Early depiction of local complications or distant embolization has a great impact on patient management and prognosis, as it may induce to aggressive antibiotic treatment or, in more advanced cases, cardiac surgery. In this setting, the multimodality imaging has assumed a pivotal role in the clinical decision making and it requires the physician to be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging technique. Echocardiography is the first imaging test, but it has several limitations. Therefore, the integration with other imaging modalities (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear imaging) becomes often necessary. Different strategies should be applied depending on whether the infection is suspected or already ascertained, whether located in native or prosthetic valves, in the left or right chambers, or if it involves an implanted cardiac device. In addition, detection of extracardiac IE-related lesions is crucial for a correct management and treatment. The aim of this review is to illustrate strengths and weaknesses of the various methods in the most common clinical scenarios.

Galea, N., Bandera, F., Lauri, C., Autore, C., Laghi, A., Erba, P. (2020). Multimodality imaging in the diagnostic work-up of endocarditis and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 9(7), 1-24 [10.3390/jcm9072237].

Multimodality imaging in the diagnostic work-up of endocarditis and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection

Erba P. A.
Ultimo
2020

Abstract

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious cardiac condition, which includes a wide range of clinical presentations, with varying degrees of severity. The diagnosis is multifactorial and a proper characterization of disease requires the identification of the primary site of infection (usually the cardiac valve) and the search of secondary systemic complications. Early depiction of local complications or distant embolization has a great impact on patient management and prognosis, as it may induce to aggressive antibiotic treatment or, in more advanced cases, cardiac surgery. In this setting, the multimodality imaging has assumed a pivotal role in the clinical decision making and it requires the physician to be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging technique. Echocardiography is the first imaging test, but it has several limitations. Therefore, the integration with other imaging modalities (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear imaging) becomes often necessary. Different strategies should be applied depending on whether the infection is suspected or already ascertained, whether located in native or prosthetic valves, in the left or right chambers, or if it involves an implanted cardiac device. In addition, detection of extracardiac IE-related lesions is crucial for a correct management and treatment. The aim of this review is to illustrate strengths and weaknesses of the various methods in the most common clinical scenarios.
Articolo in rivista - Review Essay
Computed tomography; Echocardiography; Endocarditis team; Infective endocarditis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multimodality imaging; Nuclear imaging; Positron emission tomography;
English
2020
9
7
1
24
2237
open
Galea, N., Bandera, F., Lauri, C., Autore, C., Laghi, A., Erba, P. (2020). Multimodality imaging in the diagnostic work-up of endocarditis and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 9(7), 1-24 [10.3390/jcm9072237].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Galea-2020-jcm.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 11.99 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
11.99 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/419719
Citazioni
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
Social impact