Exploration of subjective experiences during seizures may enhance knowledge of the differing natures of epilepsy and nonepileptic attack disorder (NEAD). We performed a quantitative evaluation of both the general level of awareness and the specific contents of consciousness during seizures using the Ictal Consciousness Inventory (ICI). Ninety-five adult outpatients attending general neuropsychiatry and epilepsy clinics with established diagnoses of either epilepsy (n= 66) or NEAD (n= 29) completed one ICI for each witnessed seizure recalled. Patients with a dubious/dual diagnosis were excluded. ICI Level (ICI-L) and ICI Content (ICI-L) scores were calculated for the 167 questionnaires generated by patients with epilepsy (n. = 119, of which 58 from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, 14 frontal lobe epilepsy, and 47 idiopathic 30 generalized epilepsy) and patients with NEAD (n= 48). Mann-Whitney U tests revealed statistically significant higher ICI-L and ICI-C scores for patients with NEAD (both P= 0.01). Subjective reports of consciousness experiences varied between epilepsy and NEAD, with patients with NEAD reporting significantly greater levels of general awareness/responsiveness and more vivid subjective experiences during attacks. The ICI is proposed as a potentially useful self-report instrument to supplement clinical and instrumental tests for the differential diagnosis of epilepsy and NEAD.

Ali, F., Rickards, H., Bagary, M., Greenhill, L., Mccorry, D., Cavanna, A. (2010). Ictal consciousness in epilepsy and non-epileptic attack disorder. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 19(3), 522-525 [10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.08.014].

Ictal consciousness in epilepsy and non-epileptic attack disorder

Cavanna A
2010

Abstract

Exploration of subjective experiences during seizures may enhance knowledge of the differing natures of epilepsy and nonepileptic attack disorder (NEAD). We performed a quantitative evaluation of both the general level of awareness and the specific contents of consciousness during seizures using the Ictal Consciousness Inventory (ICI). Ninety-five adult outpatients attending general neuropsychiatry and epilepsy clinics with established diagnoses of either epilepsy (n= 66) or NEAD (n= 29) completed one ICI for each witnessed seizure recalled. Patients with a dubious/dual diagnosis were excluded. ICI Level (ICI-L) and ICI Content (ICI-L) scores were calculated for the 167 questionnaires generated by patients with epilepsy (n. = 119, of which 58 from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, 14 frontal lobe epilepsy, and 47 idiopathic 30 generalized epilepsy) and patients with NEAD (n= 48). Mann-Whitney U tests revealed statistically significant higher ICI-L and ICI-C scores for patients with NEAD (both P= 0.01). Subjective reports of consciousness experiences varied between epilepsy and NEAD, with patients with NEAD reporting significantly greater levels of general awareness/responsiveness and more vivid subjective experiences during attacks. The ICI is proposed as a potentially useful self-report instrument to supplement clinical and instrumental tests for the differential diagnosis of epilepsy and NEAD.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Consciousness; Epilepsy; Ictal Consciousness Inventory; Nonepileptic attack disorder; Psychogenic nonepileptic seizure;
English
2010
19
3
522
525
reserved
Ali, F., Rickards, H., Bagary, M., Greenhill, L., Mccorry, D., Cavanna, A. (2010). Ictal consciousness in epilepsy and non-epileptic attack disorder. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 19(3), 522-525 [10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.08.014].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ali-2010-Epil Behav-VoR.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Brief communication
Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 441.7 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
441.7 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/414204
Citazioni
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
Social impact