Currently, standard treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) comprises chemotherapy (CT) and/or biological therapy (BT) and/or best supportive care (BSC). The present study performed a meta-analysis on five phase II-III randomized clinical trials, which compared CT/BT/BSC as the control arm with the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) alone or in combination with cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 or mitogen activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors as the experimental arm, to evaluate whether a standard approach could be overcome using the novel target therapy strategy. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival was 0.95 in favor of the experimental arm [95% confi- dence interval (CI), 0.74-1.22; P=0.68]. Heterogeneity was significant: Cochran's Q, 21.0; P=0.0082; I2 index, 76%. Pooled HR for overall survival was 0.88 in favor of the experimental arm (95% CI, 0.75-1.02; P=0.08). Heterogeneity was not significant (Cochran's Q, 6.0; P=0.31; I2 index, 16%). The present meta-analysis demonstrated a trend toward the improvement of survival by PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in mCRC. Further homogeneous studies are necessary to strengthen these results, beyond the known benefits of ICIs in deficient mismatch repair/high microsatellite instability tumors.

Rotundo, M., Bagnardi, V., Rotundo, M., Comande, M., Zampino, M. (2022). PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, a novel strategy for targeting metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 23(4) [10.3892/ol.2022.13254].

PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, a novel strategy for targeting metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Bagnardi V.;
2022

Abstract

Currently, standard treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) comprises chemotherapy (CT) and/or biological therapy (BT) and/or best supportive care (BSC). The present study performed a meta-analysis on five phase II-III randomized clinical trials, which compared CT/BT/BSC as the control arm with the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) alone or in combination with cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 or mitogen activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors as the experimental arm, to evaluate whether a standard approach could be overcome using the novel target therapy strategy. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival was 0.95 in favor of the experimental arm [95% confi- dence interval (CI), 0.74-1.22; P=0.68]. Heterogeneity was significant: Cochran's Q, 21.0; P=0.0082; I2 index, 76%. Pooled HR for overall survival was 0.88 in favor of the experimental arm (95% CI, 0.75-1.02; P=0.08). Heterogeneity was not significant (Cochran's Q, 6.0; P=0.31; I2 index, 16%). The present meta-analysis demonstrated a trend toward the improvement of survival by PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in mCRC. Further homogeneous studies are necessary to strengthen these results, beyond the known benefits of ICIs in deficient mismatch repair/high microsatellite instability tumors.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Colorectal cancer; Immune checkpoint inhibitor; Immunotherapy; Meta-analysis; Programmed cell death protein 1; Programmed death ligand 1;
English
23-feb-2022
2022
23
4
134
open
Rotundo, M., Bagnardi, V., Rotundo, M., Comande, M., Zampino, M. (2022). PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, a novel strategy for targeting metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 23(4) [10.3892/ol.2022.13254].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10281-398248_VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 790.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
790.42 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/398248
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
Social impact