After defining what is meant by inclusivity and quality in design respectively, we will point out the more general question underlying this discussion, which, reduced to its general form, is relevant to every activity that has a normative dimension. The paper provides an argument for design as a deliberative enterprise.

Bianchin, M., Heylighen, A. (2010). The case for deliberative design. In CEPHAD 2010. The borderland between philosophy and design research (pp.31-33). Copenhagen : The Danish Design School.

The case for deliberative design

BIANCHIN, MATTEO;
2010

Abstract

After defining what is meant by inclusivity and quality in design respectively, we will point out the more general question underlying this discussion, which, reduced to its general form, is relevant to every activity that has a normative dimension. The paper provides an argument for design as a deliberative enterprise.
paper
Deliberation; Design; Inclusion; Normativity
English
CEPHAD 2010. The borderland between philosophy and design research
Lynge, N., Galle P.
CEPHAD 2010. The borderland between philosophy and design research
87-9854786-6-0
2010
31
33
none
Bianchin, M., Heylighen, A. (2010). The case for deliberative design. In CEPHAD 2010. The borderland between philosophy and design research (pp.31-33). Copenhagen : The Danish Design School.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/38969
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact