Organizational science literature frequently employs biological metaphors, likening organizations to organisms that not only strive for survival but also learn from experience. Yet, this accumulated knowledge can become obsolete as internal and external environments evolve, necessitating the abandonment of outdated beliefs and knowledge—a process termed "unlearning." Introduced by Hedberg (1981) and Nystrom and Starbuck (1984), unlearning is defined as the deliberate discarding of old knowledge to make way for new insights, especially crucial in hypercompetitive environments. Despite its growing relevance, the concept of unlearning lacks a clear, consistent definition and its distinction from psychological concepts like forgetting remains unclear. Our study aims to clarify unlearning by achieving three objectives: delineating how unlearning is defined across organizational literature, exploring its relationship with psychological concepts, and proposing a cognitively plausible definition of unlearning. We propose a multidimensional taxonomy of unlearning, argue for its unique position within cognitive literature, and offer a definition that facilitates empirically testable theories. This work seeks to refine the theoretical foundation of organizational systems by elucidating a concept critical to adapting in rapidly changing environments.

Maccioni, S., Ghiringhelli, C., Datteri, E. (2024). Can people unlearn? A reflection on the conceptual and cognitive foundations of organization systems theory. In Current Topics in Logic and the Philosophy of Science. Papers from SILFS 2022 postgraduate conference.

Can people unlearn? A reflection on the conceptual and cognitive foundations of organization systems theory

Maccioni, S;Ghiringhelli, C;Datteri, E
2024

Abstract

Organizational science literature frequently employs biological metaphors, likening organizations to organisms that not only strive for survival but also learn from experience. Yet, this accumulated knowledge can become obsolete as internal and external environments evolve, necessitating the abandonment of outdated beliefs and knowledge—a process termed "unlearning." Introduced by Hedberg (1981) and Nystrom and Starbuck (1984), unlearning is defined as the deliberate discarding of old knowledge to make way for new insights, especially crucial in hypercompetitive environments. Despite its growing relevance, the concept of unlearning lacks a clear, consistent definition and its distinction from psychological concepts like forgetting remains unclear. Our study aims to clarify unlearning by achieving three objectives: delineating how unlearning is defined across organizational literature, exploring its relationship with psychological concepts, and proposing a cognitively plausible definition of unlearning. We propose a multidimensional taxonomy of unlearning, argue for its unique position within cognitive literature, and offer a definition that facilitates empirically testable theories. This work seeks to refine the theoretical foundation of organizational systems by elucidating a concept critical to adapting in rapidly changing environments.
paper
Unlearning, Organization system theory, Change management, Cognitive sciences
English
Current Topics in Logic and the Philosophy of Science. Papers from SILFS 2022 postgraduate conference
2022
Bianchini, F; Fano, V; Graziani, P
Current Topics in Logic and the Philosophy of Science. Papers from SILFS 2022 postgraduate conference
9781848904552
2024
2024
https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/silfs/?00030
open
Maccioni, S., Ghiringhelli, C., Datteri, E. (2024). Can people unlearn? A reflection on the conceptual and cognitive foundations of organization systems theory. In Current Topics in Logic and the Philosophy of Science. Papers from SILFS 2022 postgraduate conference.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Maccioni-2024-SILFS 2022-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Altro
Dimensione 257.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
257.47 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/388209
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact