Background: During the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic wave, an unprecedented number of patients with respiratory failure due to a new, highly contagious virus needed hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The aim of the present study was to describe the communication and visiting policies of Italian intensive care units (ICUs) during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave and national lockdown and compare these data with prepandemic conditions. Methods: A national web-based survey was conducted among 290 Italian hospitals. Each ICU (active between February 24 and May 31, 2020) was encouraged to complete an individual questionnaire inquiring the hospital/ICU structure/organization, communication/visiting habits and the role of clinical psychology prior to, and during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave. Results: Two hundred and nine ICUs from 154 hospitals (53% of the contacted hospitals) completed the survey (202 adult and 7 pediatric ICUs). Among adult ICUs, 60% were dedicated to COVID-19 patients, 21% were dedicated to patients without COVID-19 and 19% were dedicated to both categories (Mixed). A total of 11,102 adult patients were admitted to the participating ICUs during the study period and only approximately 6% of patients received at least one visit. Communication with family members was guaranteed daily through an increased use of electronic devices and was preferentially addressed to the same family member. Compared to the prepandemic period, clinical psychologists supported physicians more often regarding communication with family members. Fewer patients received at least one visit from family members in COVID and mixed-ICUs than in non-COVID ICUs, l (0 [0-6]%, 0 [0-4]% and 11 [2-25]%, respectively, p < 0.001). Habits of pediatric ICUs were less affected by the pandemic. Conclusions: Visiting policies of Italian ICUs dedicated to adult patients were markedly altered during the first COVID-19 wave. Remote communication was widely adopted as a surrogate for family meetings. New strategies to favor a family-centered approach during the current and future pandemics are warranted.

Langer, T., Depalo, F., Forlini, C., Landini, S., Mezzetti, A., Previtali, P., et al. (2022). Communication and visiting policies in Italian intensive care units during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave and lockdown: a nationwide survey. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 22(1 (December 2022)) [10.1186/s12871-022-01726-1].

Communication and visiting policies in Italian intensive care units during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave and lockdown: a nationwide survey

Langer, Thomas;Depalo, Francesca Carmela;Forlini, Clarissa;Fumagalli, Roberto
;
Favarato, Martina
Membro del Collaboration Group
2022

Abstract

Background: During the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic wave, an unprecedented number of patients with respiratory failure due to a new, highly contagious virus needed hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The aim of the present study was to describe the communication and visiting policies of Italian intensive care units (ICUs) during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave and national lockdown and compare these data with prepandemic conditions. Methods: A national web-based survey was conducted among 290 Italian hospitals. Each ICU (active between February 24 and May 31, 2020) was encouraged to complete an individual questionnaire inquiring the hospital/ICU structure/organization, communication/visiting habits and the role of clinical psychology prior to, and during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave. Results: Two hundred and nine ICUs from 154 hospitals (53% of the contacted hospitals) completed the survey (202 adult and 7 pediatric ICUs). Among adult ICUs, 60% were dedicated to COVID-19 patients, 21% were dedicated to patients without COVID-19 and 19% were dedicated to both categories (Mixed). A total of 11,102 adult patients were admitted to the participating ICUs during the study period and only approximately 6% of patients received at least one visit. Communication with family members was guaranteed daily through an increased use of electronic devices and was preferentially addressed to the same family member. Compared to the prepandemic period, clinical psychologists supported physicians more often regarding communication with family members. Fewer patients received at least one visit from family members in COVID and mixed-ICUs than in non-COVID ICUs, l (0 [0-6]%, 0 [0-4]% and 11 [2-25]%, respectively, p < 0.001). Habits of pediatric ICUs were less affected by the pandemic. Conclusions: Visiting policies of Italian ICUs dedicated to adult patients were markedly altered during the first COVID-19 wave. Remote communication was widely adopted as a surrogate for family meetings. New strategies to favor a family-centered approach during the current and future pandemics are warranted.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Health communication; Intensive care units; Pandemics; Patient-centered care; Professional-family relations;
English
Favarato Martina on behalf of the COMVISCOV group
Langer, T., Depalo, F., Forlini, C., Landini, S., Mezzetti, A., Previtali, P., et al. (2022). Communication and visiting policies in Italian intensive care units during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave and lockdown: a nationwide survey. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 22(1 (December 2022)) [10.1186/s12871-022-01726-1].
Langer, T; Depalo, F; Forlini, C; Landini, S; Mezzetti, A; Previtali, P; Monti, G; de Toma, C; Biscardi, D; Giannini, A; Fumagalli, R; Mistraletti, G; Lissoni, B; De Martini, A; Mareto, N; Rossitto, C; Zummo, U; Taverna, M; Machieraldo, P; Navarra, M; Parlanti Garbero, M; Scaletti, C; Perno, S; Amendolia, L; Montrucchio, G; Veliaj, D; Barbarello, G; Alesci, M; Bolgiaghi, L; Vailati, D; Pezzi, A; Boselli, E; Piccoli, F; Greco, M; Gemma, M; Resta, M; Crotti, S; Bottino, N; Abruzzese, C; Savioli, M; Migliorino, G; Muttini, S; Umbrello, M; Borghi, B; Greco, S; Dizeo, M; Bottiroli, M; Mondino, M; Prosepri, M; Casella, G; Curto, F; Zaniboni, M; Giudici, R; Gentile, C; Bombino, M; Rona, R; Cortinovis, B; Benini, A; Avalli, L; Tavola, M; Ferrario, M; Preda, R; Primerano, E; Russo, G; Porta, V; Valdambrini, F; Fassini, P; Orando, S; Beck, E; Pedeferri, M; Cogliati, G; Testini, D; Moroni, B; Codeluppi, V; Ruggeri, P; Milanesi, E; Belliato, M; Besozzi, A; Riccio, M; Zerbi, S; Corbella, D; Ferri, F; Grazioli, L; Bonanomi, E; Giacomini, M; Sacchi, N; Codognola, C; Ambrosini, A; Guatteri, L; Subert, M; Castelli, G; Borelli, M; Venier, E; Dittura, L; Buttera, S; Bigai, R; Magnoni, S; Rauch, S; Colombo, A; Fullin, G; Donolato, C; Cattin, S; State, V; Redeghieri, E; Russo, A; Pastorini, S; Allena, S; Munari, M; Turchet, F; Peta, M; De Santis, V; Scala, C; Facondini, F; Marangoni, E; Tassinati, T; Zanzani, C; Russo, E; Marchio, A; Barbagallo, M; Girardis, M; Taffache, P; Mordacci, M; Vincenzi, M; Pennica, M; Bracciotti, G; Iori, P; Gambi, D; Cappellini, I; Vegnuti, L; De Luca, A; Romagnoli, S; Mosti, G; Carla, R; Roticiani, V; Pelagalli, L; Fuselli, E; D’Avino, E; De Bellis, M; Gianni, G; Leonardis, F; Rossi, M; Lorusso, R; Magnanimi, E; Martelli, S; Baisi, F; Balsamo, D; Cotticelli, V; Mattei, A; Farinelli, I; Riccini, T; Cola, L; Jorio, A; Iacobone, E; Domizi, R; Pizzi, S; Nasso, A; Graziani, R; Monaco, A; Manno, M; Ottelio, C; Del Rio, M; Serra, A; Enna, B; Loddo, F; Galbiati, R; Mellea, S; Kimberly, M; Vissani, M; Romito, F; Baccari, L; Zarrillo, N; Esposito, C; Murino, P; Notaro, S; Ausiello, C; Marra, A; Policastro, C; Cafora, C; De Benedectis, G; Di Falco, V; Sciddurlo, M; Negro, G; Vetuschi, P; Recchia, A; Pasquariello, R; Squillace, R; Ciambrone, A; Bencivenga, C; Camiolo, M; Agozzino, C; Oliveri, F; Notarrigo, T; Castiglione, G; Mo, A; Condorelli, L; Favarato, M
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Langer T_BMC Anesthesaiol_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 1.07 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.07 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/384080
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
Social impact