Background: In traumatic brain injury (TBI), large between-center differences in treatment and outcome for patients managed in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been shown. The aim of this study is to explore if European neurotrauma centers can be clustered, based on their treatment preference in different domains of TBI care in the ICU. Methods: Provider profiles of centers participating in the Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI study were used to assess correlations within and between the predefined domains: intracranial pressure monitoring, coagulation and transfusion, surgery, prophylactic antibiotics, and more general ICU treatment policies. Hierarchical clustering using Ward’s minimum variance method was applied to group data with the highest similarity. Heat maps were used to visualize whether hospitals could be grouped to uncover types of hospitals adhering to certain treatment strategies. Results: Provider profiles were available from 66 centers in 20 different countries in Europe and Israel. Correlations within most of the predefined domains varied from low to high correlations (mean correlation coefficients 0.2–0.7). Correlations between domains were lower, with mean correlation coefficients of 0.2. Cluster analysis showed that policies could be grouped, but hospitals could not be grouped based on their preference. Conclusions: Although correlations between treatment policies within domains were found, the failure to cluster hospitals indicates that a specific treatment choice within a domain is not a proxy for other treatment choices within or outside the domain. These results imply that studying the effects of specific TBI interventions on outcome can be based on between-center variation without being substantially confounded by other treatments. Trial registration: We do not report the results of a health care intervention.

Ceyisakar, I., Huijben, J., Maas, A., Lingsma, H., van Leeuwen, N., & Citerio, G. (2022). Can We Cluster ICU Treatment Strategies for Traumatic Brain Injury by Hospital Treatment Preferences?. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 36(3), 846-856 [10.1007/s12028-021-01386-y].

Can We Cluster ICU Treatment Strategies for Traumatic Brain Injury by Hospital Treatment Preferences?

Citerio G
Membro del Collaboration Group
2022

Abstract

Background: In traumatic brain injury (TBI), large between-center differences in treatment and outcome for patients managed in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been shown. The aim of this study is to explore if European neurotrauma centers can be clustered, based on their treatment preference in different domains of TBI care in the ICU. Methods: Provider profiles of centers participating in the Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI study were used to assess correlations within and between the predefined domains: intracranial pressure monitoring, coagulation and transfusion, surgery, prophylactic antibiotics, and more general ICU treatment policies. Hierarchical clustering using Ward’s minimum variance method was applied to group data with the highest similarity. Heat maps were used to visualize whether hospitals could be grouped to uncover types of hospitals adhering to certain treatment strategies. Results: Provider profiles were available from 66 centers in 20 different countries in Europe and Israel. Correlations within most of the predefined domains varied from low to high correlations (mean correlation coefficients 0.2–0.7). Correlations between domains were lower, with mean correlation coefficients of 0.2. Cluster analysis showed that policies could be grouped, but hospitals could not be grouped based on their preference. Conclusions: Although correlations between treatment policies within domains were found, the failure to cluster hospitals indicates that a specific treatment choice within a domain is not a proxy for other treatment choices within or outside the domain. These results imply that studying the effects of specific TBI interventions on outcome can be based on between-center variation without being substantially confounded by other treatments. Trial registration: We do not report the results of a health care intervention.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Scientifica
Between-hospital variation; Comparative effectiveness research; Provider profiling; Traumatic brain injury;
English
Citerio Giuseppe CENTER-TBI participants and investigators
Ceyisakar, I., Huijben, J., Maas, A., Lingsma, H., van Leeuwen, N., & Citerio, G. (2022). Can We Cluster ICU Treatment Strategies for Traumatic Brain Injury by Hospital Treatment Preferences?. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 36(3), 846-856 [10.1007/s12028-021-01386-y].
Ceyisakar, I; Huijben, J; Maas, A; Lingsma, H; van Leeuwen, N; Citerio, G
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ceyisakar2022_Article_CanWeClusterICUTreatmentStrate.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 1.41 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.41 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10281/376676
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
Social impact