In the last few decades, fundamental changes have occurred in Italian society, particularly in the fields of reproduction and family models. Yet despite these changes, the Italian law regulating assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) restricts provision of fertility treatments to “stable heterosexual couples” who are clinically infertile. Italian regulation of ARTs is embedded in the production of a new form of “othering”, through the definition of which categories of parents are acceptable and which are not. In this article, we will take into account both the process of othering as the macrodiscourse that defines what can be considered a “family” and the intended parents’ individual forms of positioning in otherness. We will use the concept of othering from a double perspective: on the one hand, focusing on the macro discourses in which power is assumed to lie in the hands of the powerful; on the other, investigating how otherness is perfomed by marginal persons. On the bases of the analyses of the Italian public debate on ARTs and of twelve interviews with patients who had experienced assisted kinship from the margins we will illustrate how the production of “otherness” is not related only to a legal framework, but rather to a dominant rhetoric of what is supposed to be a “real” family.
Perrotta, M., Parolin, L. (2012). On the fringe of parenthood: othering and otherness in the Italian assisted kinship. AG-ABOUT GENDER, 1(2), 101-131.
On the fringe of parenthood: othering and otherness in the Italian assisted kinship
PAROLIN, LAURA LUCIA
2012
Abstract
In the last few decades, fundamental changes have occurred in Italian society, particularly in the fields of reproduction and family models. Yet despite these changes, the Italian law regulating assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) restricts provision of fertility treatments to “stable heterosexual couples” who are clinically infertile. Italian regulation of ARTs is embedded in the production of a new form of “othering”, through the definition of which categories of parents are acceptable and which are not. In this article, we will take into account both the process of othering as the macrodiscourse that defines what can be considered a “family” and the intended parents’ individual forms of positioning in otherness. We will use the concept of othering from a double perspective: on the one hand, focusing on the macro discourses in which power is assumed to lie in the hands of the powerful; on the other, investigating how otherness is perfomed by marginal persons. On the bases of the analyses of the Italian public debate on ARTs and of twelve interviews with patients who had experienced assisted kinship from the margins we will illustrate how the production of “otherness” is not related only to a legal framework, but rather to a dominant rhetoric of what is supposed to be a “real” family.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.