Background: Uncertainties remain regarding the indications, management, and effect of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and treatment on outcome in spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) patients. Methods: Analysisof spontaneous ICH patients enrolled in the SYNAPSE-ICU study an international prospective observational study on the use of ICP monitoring. This study aimed to describe, in a large cohort of patients with spontaneous ICH admitted to ICU, the clinical practice of ICP monitoring, the occurrence of intracranial hypertension and its therapeutic management. We further assessed in-hospital mortality and the association between ICP monitoring and 6-months mortality and outcome by a propensity score approach with inverse probability weighting. Results: 587 ICH patients were included in this study; 281 (47.9%) received ICP monitoring. ICP-monitored patients, compared to non-monitored, were younger (61 vs 67 years, p<0.001), presented more frequently with both reactive pupils (67.2%, vs 55.2%, p=0.008), with better neurological status at admission (GCS≤ 8, 82.3% vs 88.8%, p=0.038) and received higher therapy intensity level during ICU stay. In 70.5% (170 out of 241) of ICP monitored patients the ICH score was equal to 3 or 4. Nearly half of monitored patients (46.6%) had at least one episode of ICP ≥ 20 mmHg during the first week. An intraventricular catheter (53.6%) was the most frequently used device and had fewer episodes of intracranial hypertension compared to the other monitoring devices (43.7% vs 64.9%, respectively). At weighted Cox regression model, ICP monitoring was associated with a significant reduction of 6-month mortality (Hazard Ratio, HR= 0.49 (95% Confidence Intervals CI=0.35-0.71, p=0.001), but not with neurological outcome (OR=0.83, 95%CI= 0.41-1.68, p=0.6077). Conclusions: ICP monitoring in ICH was utilized mainly in moderately severe cases. ICP monitoring was associated with a reduction of in-hospital and 6-month mortality but did not improve 6-months functional outcomes. Further research and randomized controlled trials to generate higher-level medical evidence to support guidelines regarding ICP use and treatment in patients with ICH are needed.
Dallagiacoma, S., Robba, C., Graziano, F., Rebora, P., Hemphill, J., Galimberti, S., et al. (2022). Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Insights From the SYNAPSE-ICU Study. NEUROLOGY, 99(2), 98-108 [10.1212/WNL.0000000000200568].
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Insights From the SYNAPSE-ICU Study
Graziano, Francesca;Rebora, Paola;Galimberti, Stefania;Citerio, Giuseppe
2022
Abstract
Background: Uncertainties remain regarding the indications, management, and effect of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and treatment on outcome in spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) patients. Methods: Analysisof spontaneous ICH patients enrolled in the SYNAPSE-ICU study an international prospective observational study on the use of ICP monitoring. This study aimed to describe, in a large cohort of patients with spontaneous ICH admitted to ICU, the clinical practice of ICP monitoring, the occurrence of intracranial hypertension and its therapeutic management. We further assessed in-hospital mortality and the association between ICP monitoring and 6-months mortality and outcome by a propensity score approach with inverse probability weighting. Results: 587 ICH patients were included in this study; 281 (47.9%) received ICP monitoring. ICP-monitored patients, compared to non-monitored, were younger (61 vs 67 years, p<0.001), presented more frequently with both reactive pupils (67.2%, vs 55.2%, p=0.008), with better neurological status at admission (GCS≤ 8, 82.3% vs 88.8%, p=0.038) and received higher therapy intensity level during ICU stay. In 70.5% (170 out of 241) of ICP monitored patients the ICH score was equal to 3 or 4. Nearly half of monitored patients (46.6%) had at least one episode of ICP ≥ 20 mmHg during the first week. An intraventricular catheter (53.6%) was the most frequently used device and had fewer episodes of intracranial hypertension compared to the other monitoring devices (43.7% vs 64.9%, respectively). At weighted Cox regression model, ICP monitoring was associated with a significant reduction of 6-month mortality (Hazard Ratio, HR= 0.49 (95% Confidence Intervals CI=0.35-0.71, p=0.001), but not with neurological outcome (OR=0.83, 95%CI= 0.41-1.68, p=0.6077). Conclusions: ICP monitoring in ICH was utilized mainly in moderately severe cases. ICP monitoring was associated with a reduction of in-hospital and 6-month mortality but did not improve 6-months functional outcomes. Further research and randomized controlled trials to generate higher-level medical evidence to support guidelines regarding ICP use and treatment in patients with ICH are needed.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
WNL.0000000000200568.full.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia di allegato:
Submitted Version (Pre-print)
Dimensione
1.42 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.42 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.