Rockfalls pose a significant threat to life and property, although significant advances in rockfall protection have been made in the past decade. Determining rockfall processes and related hazard, however, remains a difficult task, because of the complexity and intrinsic stochastic nature of the physics involved. Appropriate application of rockfall modelling tools requires a thorough understanding of their logic, assumptions, advantages, and limitations, as well as careful assessment of rockfall sources, block and slope characteristics, and model calibration data. This chapter provides a discussion of major issues in rockfall definition, characterisation, and modelling, with special emphasis on rockfall runout. Our discussion is supported by modelling examples carried out using the 3D simulator Hy-STONE. Different modelling approaches are critically evaluated, including the empirical shadow angle method, and 2D and 3D mathematical models. Application of the shadow angle concept requires the user to be aware of several issues related to definition of the shadow angle and the effects of morphological constraints. Most limitations of empirical approaches can be overcome with mathematical models that account for slope morphology and roughness, energy dissipation at impact or by rolling, and the effects of vegetation, block fragmentation, and block-structure interaction. We discuss different modelling approaches and calibration problems and the important dependency of model parameters and results on correct characterisation of topography.
Frattini, P., Crosta, G., Agliardi, F. (2012). Rockfall characterization and modeling. In J.J. Clague, D. Stead (a cura di), Landslides Types, mechanisms and modeling (pp. 267-281). Cambridge University Press.
Rockfall characterization and modeling
FRATTINI, PAOLO;CROSTA, GIOVANNI;AGLIARDI, FEDERICO
2012
Abstract
Rockfalls pose a significant threat to life and property, although significant advances in rockfall protection have been made in the past decade. Determining rockfall processes and related hazard, however, remains a difficult task, because of the complexity and intrinsic stochastic nature of the physics involved. Appropriate application of rockfall modelling tools requires a thorough understanding of their logic, assumptions, advantages, and limitations, as well as careful assessment of rockfall sources, block and slope characteristics, and model calibration data. This chapter provides a discussion of major issues in rockfall definition, characterisation, and modelling, with special emphasis on rockfall runout. Our discussion is supported by modelling examples carried out using the 3D simulator Hy-STONE. Different modelling approaches are critically evaluated, including the empirical shadow angle method, and 2D and 3D mathematical models. Application of the shadow angle concept requires the user to be aware of several issues related to definition of the shadow angle and the effects of morphological constraints. Most limitations of empirical approaches can be overcome with mathematical models that account for slope morphology and roughness, energy dissipation at impact or by rolling, and the effects of vegetation, block fragmentation, and block-structure interaction. We discuss different modelling approaches and calibration problems and the important dependency of model parameters and results on correct characterisation of topography.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.