End-stage liver disease related to HCV infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation both in Europe and in USA (; ). The results of liver transplantation for this indication are negatively affected by the high rate of viral recurrence which, through an accelerated rate of disease progression, significantly impairs patient and graft survival. Given this scenario, post-transplant viral eradication should be identified as a primary goal. At present, a combined regimen with pegylated interferon and ribavirin leads to sustained virological response (SVR) in approximately 30% of transplanted patients, which is significantly lower than in immunocompetent subjects. The main problem lies in the high rate of side effects which leads a significant proportion of patients to not receive appropriate therapy. Moreover, in view of the immunological activity of interferon, transplanted patients are exposed to additional immunological risks. Thus, role and efficacy of antiviral therapy in HCV recurrent hepatitis is still under debate. Nevertheless, a progressive amount of data from field practice are now demonstrating that SVR after post-transplant antiviral treatment is associated with a significant benefit on patient and graft survival and is the most relevant modifier of the natural history of HCV recurrent disease after liver transplantation.

Rendina, M., Fagiuoli, S., Burra, P., Castellaneta, N., Zappimbulso, M., Castellaneta, A., et al. (2011). Facing HCV recurrence after liver transplantation: Antiviral therapy response and clinical outcome. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. SUPPLEMENT, 5(1), 30-35 [10.1016/S1594-5804(11)60023-5].

Facing HCV recurrence after liver transplantation: Antiviral therapy response and clinical outcome

Fagiuoli, S;
2011

Abstract

End-stage liver disease related to HCV infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation both in Europe and in USA (; ). The results of liver transplantation for this indication are negatively affected by the high rate of viral recurrence which, through an accelerated rate of disease progression, significantly impairs patient and graft survival. Given this scenario, post-transplant viral eradication should be identified as a primary goal. At present, a combined regimen with pegylated interferon and ribavirin leads to sustained virological response (SVR) in approximately 30% of transplanted patients, which is significantly lower than in immunocompetent subjects. The main problem lies in the high rate of side effects which leads a significant proportion of patients to not receive appropriate therapy. Moreover, in view of the immunological activity of interferon, transplanted patients are exposed to additional immunological risks. Thus, role and efficacy of antiviral therapy in HCV recurrent hepatitis is still under debate. Nevertheless, a progressive amount of data from field practice are now demonstrating that SVR after post-transplant antiviral treatment is associated with a significant benefit on patient and graft survival and is the most relevant modifier of the natural history of HCV recurrent disease after liver transplantation.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
HCV and survival in liver transplantation; Hepatitis C recurrence; Sustained virological response;
English
2011
5
1
30
35
reserved
Rendina, M., Fagiuoli, S., Burra, P., Castellaneta, N., Zappimbulso, M., Castellaneta, A., et al. (2011). Facing HCV recurrence after liver transplantation: Antiviral therapy response and clinical outcome. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. SUPPLEMENT, 5(1), 30-35 [10.1016/S1594-5804(11)60023-5].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
RENDINA dld SUPPL 2011.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Dimensione 206.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
206.9 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/353319
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact