The usefulness of design patterns in forward engineering is already well-known and several tools provide support for their application in the development of software systems. While the role of design patterns in reverse engineering is still argued primarily due to their informal definition which leads to various possible implementations of each pattern. One of the most discussed aspects related to design patterns is about the need of their formalization according to the drawbacks this can represent. Formalization leads to the identification of the so-called sub-patterns, which are the recurring fundamental elements design patterns are composed of. In this paper we analyze the role sub-patterns play-in two reverse engineering tools: FUJABA and SPQR. Attention is focused on how sub-patterns are exploited to define and to detect design patterns. To emphasize the similarities and differences between the two approaches, the Composite Design Pattern is considered as example. © 2005 IEEE.

ARCELLI FONTANA, F., Masiero, S., Raibulet, C., Tisato, F. (2005). A Comparison of Reverse Engineering Tools based on Design Pattern Decomposition. In Software Engineering Conference, 2005, Proceedings (pp.262-269). IEEE [10.1109/ASWEC.2005.5].

A Comparison of Reverse Engineering Tools based on Design Pattern Decomposition

ARCELLI FONTANA, FRANCESCA;RAIBULET, CLAUDIA;TISATO, FRANCESCO
2005

Abstract

The usefulness of design patterns in forward engineering is already well-known and several tools provide support for their application in the development of software systems. While the role of design patterns in reverse engineering is still argued primarily due to their informal definition which leads to various possible implementations of each pattern. One of the most discussed aspects related to design patterns is about the need of their formalization according to the drawbacks this can represent. Formalization leads to the identification of the so-called sub-patterns, which are the recurring fundamental elements design patterns are composed of. In this paper we analyze the role sub-patterns play-in two reverse engineering tools: FUJABA and SPQR. Attention is focused on how sub-patterns are exploited to define and to detect design patterns. To emphasize the similarities and differences between the two approaches, the Composite Design Pattern is considered as example. © 2005 IEEE.
paper
design pattern detection; reverse engineering; sub-components of design patterns
English
2005 Australian Software Engineering Conference ASWEC 2005
2005
Software Engineering Conference, 2005, Proceedings
9780769522579
2005
2005
262
269
1402021
none
ARCELLI FONTANA, F., Masiero, S., Raibulet, C., Tisato, F. (2005). A Comparison of Reverse Engineering Tools based on Design Pattern Decomposition. In Software Engineering Conference, 2005, Proceedings (pp.262-269). IEEE [10.1109/ASWEC.2005.5].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/3515
Citazioni
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
Social impact