In a series of three behavioral experiments, we found a systematic distortion of probability judgments concerning elementary visual stimuli. Participants were briefly shown a set of figures that had two features (e.g., a geometric shape and a color) with two possible values each (e.g., triangle or circle and black or white). A figure was then drawn, and participants were informed about the value of one of its features (e.g., that the figure was a “circle”) and had to predict the value of the other feature (e.g., whether the figure was “black” or “white”). We repeated this procedure for various sets of figures and, by varying the statistical association between features in the sets, we manipulated the probability of a feature given the evidence of another (e.g., the posterior probability of hypothesis “black” given the evidence “circle”) as well as the support provided by a feature to another (e.g., the impact, or confirmation, of evidence “circle” on the hypothesis “black”). Results indicated that participants’ judgments were deeply affected by impact, although they only should have depended on the probability distributions over the features, and that the dissociation between evidential impact and posterior probability increased the number of errors. The implications of these findings for lower and higher level cognitive models are discussed.

Mangiarulo, M., Pighin, S., Polonio, L., Tentori, K. (2021). The Effect of Evidential Impact on Perceptual Probabilistic Judgments. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 45(1), 1-20 [10.1111/cogs.12919].

The Effect of Evidential Impact on Perceptual Probabilistic Judgments

Polonio Luca;
2021

Abstract

In a series of three behavioral experiments, we found a systematic distortion of probability judgments concerning elementary visual stimuli. Participants were briefly shown a set of figures that had two features (e.g., a geometric shape and a color) with two possible values each (e.g., triangle or circle and black or white). A figure was then drawn, and participants were informed about the value of one of its features (e.g., that the figure was a “circle”) and had to predict the value of the other feature (e.g., whether the figure was “black” or “white”). We repeated this procedure for various sets of figures and, by varying the statistical association between features in the sets, we manipulated the probability of a feature given the evidence of another (e.g., the posterior probability of hypothesis “black” given the evidence “circle”) as well as the support provided by a feature to another (e.g., the impact, or confirmation, of evidence “circle” on the hypothesis “black”). Results indicated that participants’ judgments were deeply affected by impact, although they only should have depended on the probability distributions over the features, and that the dissociation between evidential impact and posterior probability increased the number of errors. The implications of these findings for lower and higher level cognitive models are discussed.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Bayesian confirmation; Evidential impact; Probabilistic reasoning; Visual features;
English
2021
45
1
1
20
e12919
open
Mangiarulo, M., Pighin, S., Polonio, L., Tentori, K. (2021). The Effect of Evidential Impact on Perceptual Probabilistic Judgments. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 45(1), 1-20 [10.1111/cogs.12919].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cognitive Science (2021)Mangiarulo_Pighin_Polonio_Tentori_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Submitted Version (Pre-print)
Dimensione 1.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.03 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/350026
Citazioni
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
Social impact