Two x-ray phase contrast imaging techniques are compared in a quantitative way for future mammographic applications: diffraction enhanced imaging (DEI) and phase propagation imaging (PPI). DEI involves, downstream of the sample, an analyser crystal acting as an angular filter for x-rays refracted by the sample. PPI simply uses the propagation (Fresnel diffraction) of the monochromatic and partially coherent x-ray beam over large distances. The information given by the two techniques is assessed by theoretical simulations and compared at the level of the experimental results for different kinds of samples (phantoms and real tissues). The imaging parameters such as the energy, the angular position of the analyser crystal in the DEI case or the sample to detector distance in the PPI case were varied in order to optimize the image quality in terms of contrast, visibility and figure of merit.

Pagot, E., Fiedler, S., Cloetens, P., Bravin, A., Coan, P., Fezzaa, K., et al. (2005). Quantitative comparison between two phase contrast techniques: diffraction enhanced imaging and phase propagation imaging. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 50(4), 709-724 [10.1088/0031-9155/50/4/010].

Quantitative comparison between two phase contrast techniques: diffraction enhanced imaging and phase propagation imaging

Bravin A
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2005

Abstract

Two x-ray phase contrast imaging techniques are compared in a quantitative way for future mammographic applications: diffraction enhanced imaging (DEI) and phase propagation imaging (PPI). DEI involves, downstream of the sample, an analyser crystal acting as an angular filter for x-rays refracted by the sample. PPI simply uses the propagation (Fresnel diffraction) of the monochromatic and partially coherent x-ray beam over large distances. The information given by the two techniques is assessed by theoretical simulations and compared at the level of the experimental results for different kinds of samples (phantoms and real tissues). The imaging parameters such as the energy, the angular position of the analyser crystal in the DEI case or the sample to detector distance in the PPI case were varied in order to optimize the image quality in terms of contrast, visibility and figure of merit.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
phase contrast imaging, diffraction enhanced imaging, phase propagation imaging
English
2005
50
4
709
724
reserved
Pagot, E., Fiedler, S., Cloetens, P., Bravin, A., Coan, P., Fezzaa, K., et al. (2005). Quantitative comparison between two phase contrast techniques: diffraction enhanced imaging and phase propagation imaging. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 50(4), 709-724 [10.1088/0031-9155/50/4/010].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
pagot_pmb5_4_010.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 1.33 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.33 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/343168
Citazioni
  • Scopus 107
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 93
Social impact