In x-ray phase-contrast analyzer-based imaging, the contrast is provided by a combination of absorption, refraction and scattering effects. Several extraction algorithms, which attempt to separate and quantify these different physical contributions, have been proposed and applied. In a previous work, we presented a quantitative comparison of five among the most well-known extraction algorithms based on the geometrical optics approximation applied to planar images: diffraction-enhanced imaging (DEI), extended diffractionenhanced imaging (E-DEI), generalized diffraction-enhanced imaging (G-DEI), multiple-image radiography (MIR) and Gaussian curve fitting (GCF). In this paper, we compare these algorithms in the case of the computed tomography (CT) modality. The extraction algorithms are applied to analyzerbased CT images of both plastic phantoms and biological samples (cartilageon- bone cylinders). Absorption, refraction and scattering signals are derived. Results obtained with the different algorithms may vary greatly, especially in the case of large refraction angles. We show that ABI-CT extraction algorithms can provide an excellent tool to enhance the visualization of cartilage internal structures, which may find applications in a clinical context. Besides, by using the refraction images, the refractive index decrements for both the cartilage matrix and the cartilage cells have been estimated.

Diemoz Paul, C., Bravin, A., Glaser, C., Coan, P. (2010). Comparison of analyzer-based imaging computed tomography extraction algorithms and application to bone-cartilage imaging. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 55(24), 7663-7679 [10.1088/0031-9155/55/24/018].

Comparison of analyzer-based imaging computed tomography extraction algorithms and application to bone-cartilage imaging

Bravin A
Secondo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2010

Abstract

In x-ray phase-contrast analyzer-based imaging, the contrast is provided by a combination of absorption, refraction and scattering effects. Several extraction algorithms, which attempt to separate and quantify these different physical contributions, have been proposed and applied. In a previous work, we presented a quantitative comparison of five among the most well-known extraction algorithms based on the geometrical optics approximation applied to planar images: diffraction-enhanced imaging (DEI), extended diffractionenhanced imaging (E-DEI), generalized diffraction-enhanced imaging (G-DEI), multiple-image radiography (MIR) and Gaussian curve fitting (GCF). In this paper, we compare these algorithms in the case of the computed tomography (CT) modality. The extraction algorithms are applied to analyzerbased CT images of both plastic phantoms and biological samples (cartilageon- bone cylinders). Absorption, refraction and scattering signals are derived. Results obtained with the different algorithms may vary greatly, especially in the case of large refraction angles. We show that ABI-CT extraction algorithms can provide an excellent tool to enhance the visualization of cartilage internal structures, which may find applications in a clinical context. Besides, by using the refraction images, the refractive index decrements for both the cartilage matrix and the cartilage cells have been estimated.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
analyzer-based imaging, computed tomography, extraction algorithms, bone
English
2010
55
24
7663
7679
reserved
Diemoz Paul, C., Bravin, A., Glaser, C., Coan, P. (2010). Comparison of analyzer-based imaging computed tomography extraction algorithms and application to bone-cartilage imaging. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 55(24), 7663-7679 [10.1088/0031-9155/55/24/018].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Diemoz_PMB_2010.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 1.56 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.56 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/343166
Citazioni
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
Social impact