Analytical and experimental determination of signal-to-noise ratio and figure of merit in three phase-contrast imaging techniques

We present a theoretical and experimental comparison of three X-ray phase-contrast techniques: propagation-based imaging, analyzerbased imaging and grating interferometry. The signal-to-noise ratio and the figure of merit are quantitatively compared for the three techniques on the same phantoms and using the same X-ray source and detector. Principal dependencies of the signal upon the numerous acquisition parameters, the spatial resolution and X-ray energy are discussed in detail. The sensitivity of each technique, in terms of the smallest detectable phase shift, is also evaluated.