The object of this work is to assess the persuasiveness of competing views on the existence of a right to remedial secession in the light of the events regarding Kosovo, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia. The year of secessions – as 2008 will probably be remembered – has in fact provided significant indications regarding the current attitude adopted by States and international organizations in this field.
Tancredi, A. (2008). Neither Authorized Nor Prohibited? Secession and International Law after Kosovo, South Ossetia and Abkhazia. ITALIAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2008(2008), 37-62 [10.1163/22116133-90000075].
Neither Authorized Nor Prohibited? Secession and International Law after Kosovo, South Ossetia and Abkhazia
Tancredi, A
2008
Abstract
The object of this work is to assess the persuasiveness of competing views on the existence of a right to remedial secession in the light of the events regarding Kosovo, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia. The year of secessions – as 2008 will probably be remembered – has in fact provided significant indications regarding the current attitude adopted by States and international organizations in this field.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
