Current computational and neuroscientific models of decision-making posit a discrete, serial processing distinction between upstream decisional stages and downstream processes of motor-response implementation. We investigated this frame- work in the context of two-alternative forced-choice tasks on linguistic stimuli, words and pseudowords. In two experiments, we assessed the impact of lexical frequency and action semantics on two effector-selective EEG indexes of motor-response activation: the lateralized readiness potential and the lateralization of beta-frequency power. This allowed us to track potentially continuous streams of processing progressively mapping the evaluation of linguistic stimuli onto corresponding response channels. Whereas action semantics showed no influence on EEG indexes of motor-response activation, lexical frequency affected the lateralization of response-locked beta-frequency power. We argue that these observations point toward a continuity between linguistic processing of word input stimuli and implementation of corresponding choice in terms of motor behavior. This interpretation challenges the commonly held assumption of a discrete processing distinction between decisional and motor-response processes in the context of decisions based on symbolic stimuli.

Scaltritti, M., Job, R., Alario, F., Sulpizio, S. (2020). On the boundaries between decision and action: Effector-selective lateralization of beta-frequency power is modulated by the lexical frequency of printed words. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 32(11), 2131-2144 [10.1162/jocn_a_01606].

On the boundaries between decision and action: Effector-selective lateralization of beta-frequency power is modulated by the lexical frequency of printed words

Sulpizio, S
2020

Abstract

Current computational and neuroscientific models of decision-making posit a discrete, serial processing distinction between upstream decisional stages and downstream processes of motor-response implementation. We investigated this frame- work in the context of two-alternative forced-choice tasks on linguistic stimuli, words and pseudowords. In two experiments, we assessed the impact of lexical frequency and action semantics on two effector-selective EEG indexes of motor-response activation: the lateralized readiness potential and the lateralization of beta-frequency power. This allowed us to track potentially continuous streams of processing progressively mapping the evaluation of linguistic stimuli onto corresponding response channels. Whereas action semantics showed no influence on EEG indexes of motor-response activation, lexical frequency affected the lateralization of response-locked beta-frequency power. We argue that these observations point toward a continuity between linguistic processing of word input stimuli and implementation of corresponding choice in terms of motor behavior. This interpretation challenges the commonly held assumption of a discrete processing distinction between decisional and motor-response processes in the context of decisions based on symbolic stimuli.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
lexical decision; Time-frequency; beta lateralization; EEG; semantics; frequency
English
2020
32
11
2131
2144
reserved
Scaltritti, M., Job, R., Alario, F., Sulpizio, S. (2020). On the boundaries between decision and action: Effector-selective lateralization of beta-frequency power is modulated by the lexical frequency of printed words. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 32(11), 2131-2144 [10.1162/jocn_a_01606].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ScaltrittiEtAl_JoCN_PostPrint.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Author’s Accepted Manuscript, AAM (Post-print)
Dimensione 1.36 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.36 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/325923
Citazioni
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
Social impact