Leibovich et al. argue that the evidence in favor of a perceptual mechanism devoted to the extraction of numerosity from visual collections is unsatisfactory and propose to replace it with an unspecific mechanism capturing approximate magnitudes from continuous dimensions. We argue that their representation of the evidence is incomplete and that their theoretical proposal is too vague to be useful.

Content, A., Velde, M., Adriano, A. (2017). Approximate number sense theory or approximate theory of magnitude?. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 40, e168-21 [10.1017/S0140525X16002089].

Approximate number sense theory or approximate theory of magnitude?

Adriano A.
2017

Abstract

Leibovich et al. argue that the evidence in favor of a perceptual mechanism devoted to the extraction of numerosity from visual collections is unsatisfactory and propose to replace it with an unspecific mechanism capturing approximate magnitudes from continuous dimensions. We argue that their representation of the evidence is incomplete and that their theoretical proposal is too vague to be useful.
Editoriale, introduzione, contributo a forum/dibattito
Mathematical Concepts; Cognition
English
2017
40
e168
21
none
Content, A., Velde, M., Adriano, A. (2017). Approximate number sense theory or approximate theory of magnitude?. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 40, e168-21 [10.1017/S0140525X16002089].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/324081
Citazioni
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
Social impact