The paper deals with the Supreme Court of the United States judgment in Bostock v. Clayton County, which held that discrimination based on sexual orientation cannot be severed from discrimination “because of (biological) sex”. It will then consider the opinion of the Court and the dissenting opinions filed, looking at the judicial philosophy of textualism and originalism both in the Supreme Court interpretation and in some opinions of Justice Gorsuch (who delivered the Court’s opinion in Bostock). Finally, attention will be paid to discriminations because of sexual orientation and the way the Supreme Court should consider them in order to protect social minorities.

Camoni, D. (2021). Can a word change the world? Considerazioni a partire dalla sentenza Bostock v. Clayton County della Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti. DPCE ONLINE, 45(4/2020), 4515-4544.

Can a word change the world? Considerazioni a partire dalla sentenza Bostock v. Clayton County della Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti

Camoni, D.
2021

Abstract

The paper deals with the Supreme Court of the United States judgment in Bostock v. Clayton County, which held that discrimination based on sexual orientation cannot be severed from discrimination “because of (biological) sex”. It will then consider the opinion of the Court and the dissenting opinions filed, looking at the judicial philosophy of textualism and originalism both in the Supreme Court interpretation and in some opinions of Justice Gorsuch (who delivered the Court’s opinion in Bostock). Finally, attention will be paid to discriminations because of sexual orientation and the way the Supreme Court should consider them in order to protect social minorities.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
United States Supreme Court; sex discrimination; textualism; non-discrimination principle; social minorities;
Italian
18-gen-2021
2021
45
4/2020
4515
4544
open
Camoni, D. (2021). Can a word change the world? Considerazioni a partire dalla sentenza Bostock v. Clayton County della Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti. DPCE ONLINE, 45(4/2020), 4515-4544.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bostock v. Clayton County (DPCE Online, 4-2020).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 330.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
330.65 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/300674
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact