In the Starbucks judgment, the General Court annuls the decision of the European Commission ordering the recovery of aid granted to the multinational group through an APA. The full legitimacy of the advance compliance tools is confirmed, for they are useful in providing certainty in the application of tax laws. Nonetheless, as part of the control pursuant to articles 107-108 TFEU, the Commission is competent to investigate fiscal aid conferred by tax authorities, using the arm’s length standard as a benchmark. As for the merits of the case, according to the General Court, the Commission did not prove that the APA conferred an advantage on its addressee. This contribution addresses the possible implications of the judgment on the Commission’s strategy against harmful tax competition, as well as the doubts raised by the judgment regarding the legal status of the arm’s length principle in the EU and the intensity of the review required in cases of aids conferred through APAs.
Nella sentenza annotata, il Tribunale UE annulla la decisione della Commissione europea che ordinava il recupero degli aiuti concessi al gruppo Starbucks attraverso un APA. Pur confermando la piena legittimita` degli strumenti di compliance preventiva, utili nel fornire certezza nell’applicazione delle disposizioni tributarie, viene affermata la competenza della Commissione, nell’ambito del controllo ex artt. 107-108 TFUE, a indagare anche sugli aiuti fiscali concessi in via amministrativa, servendosi dell’arm’s length standard quale benchmark. Nel merito, il Tribunale rileva che la Commissione non ha dimostrato che l’APA conferiva un vantaggio alla societa` destinataria. Si illustrano di seguito le possibili implicazioni del giudizio sulla strategia della Commissione contro le pratiche di concorrenza fiscale dannosa, nonche ́ i dubbi che solleva in ordine allo status giuridico del principio di libera concorrenza nella UE e allo standard probatorio richiesto nei casi di aiuti veicolati da APA.
Francioso, C. (2020). Il caso Starbucks: primi chiarimenti giurisprudenziali su aiuti di Stato e ruling fiscali. DIRITTO E PRATICA TRIBUTARIA INTERNAZIONALE.
Il caso Starbucks: primi chiarimenti giurisprudenziali su aiuti di Stato e ruling fiscali
Chiara Francioso
2020
Abstract
In the Starbucks judgment, the General Court annuls the decision of the European Commission ordering the recovery of aid granted to the multinational group through an APA. The full legitimacy of the advance compliance tools is confirmed, for they are useful in providing certainty in the application of tax laws. Nonetheless, as part of the control pursuant to articles 107-108 TFEU, the Commission is competent to investigate fiscal aid conferred by tax authorities, using the arm’s length standard as a benchmark. As for the merits of the case, according to the General Court, the Commission did not prove that the APA conferred an advantage on its addressee. This contribution addresses the possible implications of the judgment on the Commission’s strategy against harmful tax competition, as well as the doubts raised by the judgment regarding the legal status of the arm’s length principle in the EU and the intensity of the review required in cases of aids conferred through APAs.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.