Objectives:  The prognosis of patients with liver metastases of gastric cancer (LMGC) is dismal, but little is known about prognostic factors in these patients; thus justification for surgical resection is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to review recent outcomes of hepatectomy for LMGC and to determine which patients represent suitable candidates for surgery by assessing surgical results and clinicopathologic features. Methods:  Outcomes in 21 patients with LMGC who underwent hepatectomy between 1998 and 2007 were assessed. Isolated metastases and potential to perform a curative resection were requisite indi-cations for surgery. Surgical outcome and clinicopathologic features of the hepatic metastases were analysed. Results:  Overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates after hepatic resection were 68%, 31% and 19%, respectively; three patients survived for >5 years without recurrence. Univariate analysis revealed a solitary metastasis, negative margin (R0) resection and the presence of a peritumoral fibrous capsule as significant favourable prognostic factors. These characteristics were present in all of the three patients who survived for >5 years. Conclusions:  Solitary metastases from gastric cancer should be treated surgically and confer a better prognosis. Surgical resection should provide microscopically negative margins (R0). A new prognostic factor, the presence of a pseudocapsule, may be associated with improved prognosis.

Garancini, M., Uggeri, F., Degrate, L., Nespoli, L., Gianotti, L., Nespoli, A., et al. (2012). Surgical treatment of liver metastases of gastric cancer: is local treatment in a systemic disease worthwhile?. HPB, 14(3), 209-215 [10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00428.x].

Surgical treatment of liver metastases of gastric cancer: is local treatment in a systemic disease worthwhile?

GARANCINI, MATTIA;UGGERI, FRANCO;DEGRATE, LUCA;NESPOLI, LUCA CARLO;GIANOTTI, LUCA VITTORIO;NESPOLI, ANGELO;UGGERI, FABIO;ROMANO, FABRIZIO
2012

Abstract

Objectives:  The prognosis of patients with liver metastases of gastric cancer (LMGC) is dismal, but little is known about prognostic factors in these patients; thus justification for surgical resection is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to review recent outcomes of hepatectomy for LMGC and to determine which patients represent suitable candidates for surgery by assessing surgical results and clinicopathologic features. Methods:  Outcomes in 21 patients with LMGC who underwent hepatectomy between 1998 and 2007 were assessed. Isolated metastases and potential to perform a curative resection were requisite indi-cations for surgery. Surgical outcome and clinicopathologic features of the hepatic metastases were analysed. Results:  Overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates after hepatic resection were 68%, 31% and 19%, respectively; three patients survived for >5 years without recurrence. Univariate analysis revealed a solitary metastasis, negative margin (R0) resection and the presence of a peritumoral fibrous capsule as significant favourable prognostic factors. These characteristics were present in all of the three patients who survived for >5 years. Conclusions:  Solitary metastases from gastric cancer should be treated surgically and confer a better prognosis. Surgical resection should provide microscopically negative margins (R0). A new prognostic factor, the presence of a pseudocapsule, may be associated with improved prognosis.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
liver metastases, gastric cancer, surgery
English
2012
HPB
14
3
209
215
none
Garancini, M., Uggeri, F., Degrate, L., Nespoli, L., Gianotti, L., Nespoli, A., et al. (2012). Surgical treatment of liver metastases of gastric cancer: is local treatment in a systemic disease worthwhile?. HPB, 14(3), 209-215 [10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00428.x].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/28834
Citazioni
  • Scopus 65
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 53
Social impact