In their Comment to Resentini et al. (2020), Mesalles et al. pointed out supposed fundamental inaccuracies concerning analytical aspects and the tectonic interpretation of fission-track data. This would invalidate the main conclusions of our study. Here we demonstrate that their criticism is ill-founded.
Resentini, A., Malusa, M., Garzanti, E. (2020). Reply to Comment on Resentini et al., 2020: “Ongoing exhumation of the Taiwan orogenic wedge revealed by detrital apatite thermochronology: The impact of effective mineral fertility and zero-track grains”. EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 550 [10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116557].
Reply to Comment on Resentini et al., 2020: “Ongoing exhumation of the Taiwan orogenic wedge revealed by detrital apatite thermochronology: The impact of effective mineral fertility and zero-track grains”
Resentini A.;Malusa M. G.
;Garzanti E.
2020
Abstract
In their Comment to Resentini et al. (2020), Mesalles et al. pointed out supposed fundamental inaccuracies concerning analytical aspects and the tectonic interpretation of fission-track data. This would invalidate the main conclusions of our study. Here we demonstrate that their criticism is ill-founded.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Resentini et al 2020 - Reply to Mesalles et al - pre-print.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia di allegato:
Submitted Version (Pre-print)
Dimensione
501.17 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
501.17 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
