African hereditary groups of occupational specialists are an object of study neglected by social sciences. They often disappear into the broad category of minority groups, and social and historical analyses miss the specific characteristics of their forms of marginalisation. This article adopts the perspective of the Gaboye of Somaliland as an example of the contribution that these groups can make to the study of the transformation of labour organisation and social stratification in Africa. The case study of the Gaboye shows how labour exploitation and the marginalisation of occupational groups changed during the colonial period. Colonial institutions affected socio-economic relationships between local groups more deeply than they intended to, via the economic transformations they triggered and the consolidation of legal models and political apparatuses in Somaliland. By studying the legacies of elements which supported the Gaboye’s marginalisation in the past and focusing on their occupational segregation, the article also aims to define elements of comparative analysis which allow African hereditary groups of occupational specialists to be used as a point from which to observe processes which have affected different regions of Africa: the collapse of the postcolonial state, contemporary forms of transnational mobility, and the re-organisation of global economic networks.

Vitturini, E. (2020). The Gaboye of Somaliland: transformations and historical continuities of the labour exploitation and marginalisation of hereditary groups of occupational specialists. JOURNAL OF EASTERN AFRICAN STUDIES, 14(3), 473-491 [10.1080/17531055.2020.1773070].

The Gaboye of Somaliland: transformations and historical continuities of the labour exploitation and marginalisation of hereditary groups of occupational specialists

Vitturini, Elia
2020

Abstract

African hereditary groups of occupational specialists are an object of study neglected by social sciences. They often disappear into the broad category of minority groups, and social and historical analyses miss the specific characteristics of their forms of marginalisation. This article adopts the perspective of the Gaboye of Somaliland as an example of the contribution that these groups can make to the study of the transformation of labour organisation and social stratification in Africa. The case study of the Gaboye shows how labour exploitation and the marginalisation of occupational groups changed during the colonial period. Colonial institutions affected socio-economic relationships between local groups more deeply than they intended to, via the economic transformations they triggered and the consolidation of legal models and political apparatuses in Somaliland. By studying the legacies of elements which supported the Gaboye’s marginalisation in the past and focusing on their occupational segregation, the article also aims to define elements of comparative analysis which allow African hereditary groups of occupational specialists to be used as a point from which to observe processes which have affected different regions of Africa: the collapse of the postcolonial state, contemporary forms of transnational mobility, and the re-organisation of global economic networks.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Hereditary occupational groups, African minorities, labour, marginalisation, Gaboye, Somaliland, Somali territories
English
1-giu-2020
2020
14
3
473
491
none
Vitturini, E. (2020). The Gaboye of Somaliland: transformations and historical continuities of the labour exploitation and marginalisation of hereditary groups of occupational specialists. JOURNAL OF EASTERN AFRICAN STUDIES, 14(3), 473-491 [10.1080/17531055.2020.1773070].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/276399
Citazioni
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
Social impact