According to systemic-constructionist theory, psychopathology is a “science of meaning”: each type of psychopathology is linked to specific semantics and to the position occupied by the individual within his/her familial context. The semantics of power is considered to be the most critical dimension of meaning for people suffering from eating disorders (anorexia, bulimia and obesity). This study aimed to empirically test the theory that eating disorders are psychologically linked to the semantics of power. The hypothesis was that personal meanings of “winner/loser” and associated meanings are predominant for people suffering from eating disorders. Participants and method. The Repertory Grid Technique (Kelly, 1955) was carried out with 30 young subjects suffering from eating disorders (divided into 3 subgroups: 10 obese/overweight; 10 anorexic; 10 bulimic patients), to elicit their most significant personal constructs. A sample of 30 normal-weight people was used as a control group. Participants’ constructs were grouped into semantic categories and the data compared using proper statistical analysis. Results: The constructs of the Eating Disorder Group were found to be significantly more connected to the semantics of power than those of the Control Group. The empirical data confirm the hypothesis, although the interpretation of the results regarding subgroups seems to be less clear. These results are discussed in the light of their clinical implications and of methodological limitations of the study.

Castiglioni, M., Faccio, E., Veronese, G., Poiana Mosolo, A., Bell, R. (2011). Disturbi alimentari e costruzione del significato. PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE, 2011(3), 5-28 [10.3280/PDS2011-003001].

Disturbi alimentari e costruzione del significato

CASTIGLIONI, MARCO;VERONESE, GUIDO;
2011

Abstract

According to systemic-constructionist theory, psychopathology is a “science of meaning”: each type of psychopathology is linked to specific semantics and to the position occupied by the individual within his/her familial context. The semantics of power is considered to be the most critical dimension of meaning for people suffering from eating disorders (anorexia, bulimia and obesity). This study aimed to empirically test the theory that eating disorders are psychologically linked to the semantics of power. The hypothesis was that personal meanings of “winner/loser” and associated meanings are predominant for people suffering from eating disorders. Participants and method. The Repertory Grid Technique (Kelly, 1955) was carried out with 30 young subjects suffering from eating disorders (divided into 3 subgroups: 10 obese/overweight; 10 anorexic; 10 bulimic patients), to elicit their most significant personal constructs. A sample of 30 normal-weight people was used as a control group. Participants’ constructs were grouped into semantic categories and the data compared using proper statistical analysis. Results: The constructs of the Eating Disorder Group were found to be significantly more connected to the semantics of power than those of the Control Group. The empirical data confirm the hypothesis, although the interpretation of the results regarding subgroups seems to be less clear. These results are discussed in the light of their clinical implications and of methodological limitations of the study.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Psicopatologia, significato, disturbi alimentari, approccio sistemico-costruzionista, semantica del potere, tecnica delle griglie di repertorio
Italian
2011
2011
3
5
28
none
Castiglioni, M., Faccio, E., Veronese, G., Poiana Mosolo, A., Bell, R. (2011). Disturbi alimentari e costruzione del significato. PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE, 2011(3), 5-28 [10.3280/PDS2011-003001].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/27364
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact