Classification errors, selection bias, and uncontrolled confounders are likely to be present in most epidemiologic studies, but the uncertainty introduced by these types of biases is seldom quantified. The authors present a simple yet easyto- use Stata command to adjust the relative risk for exposure misclassification, selection bias, and an unmeasured confounder. This command implements both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. It allows the user to specify a variety of probability distributions for the bias parameters, which are used to simulate distributions for the bias-adjusted exposure–disease relative risk. We illustrate the command by applying it to a case–control study of occupational resin exposure and lung-cancer deaths. By using plausible probability distributions for the bias parameters, investigators can report results that incorporate their uncertainties regarding systematic errors and thus avoid overstating their certainty about the effect under study. These results can supplement conventional results and can help pinpoint major sources of conflict in study interpretations.

Orsini, N., Bellocco, R., Bottai, M., Wolk, A., Greenland, S. (2008). A tool for deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis of epidemiologic studies. THE STATA JOURNAL, 8(1), 29-48 [10.1177/1536867x0800800103].

A tool for deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis of epidemiologic studies

BELLOCCO, RINO;
2008

Abstract

Classification errors, selection bias, and uncontrolled confounders are likely to be present in most epidemiologic studies, but the uncertainty introduced by these types of biases is seldom quantified. The authors present a simple yet easyto- use Stata command to adjust the relative risk for exposure misclassification, selection bias, and an unmeasured confounder. This command implements both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. It allows the user to specify a variety of probability distributions for the bias parameters, which are used to simulate distributions for the bias-adjusted exposure–disease relative risk. We illustrate the command by applying it to a case–control study of occupational resin exposure and lung-cancer deaths. By using plausible probability distributions for the bias parameters, investigators can report results that incorporate their uncertainties regarding systematic errors and thus avoid overstating their certainty about the effect under study. These results can supplement conventional results and can help pinpoint major sources of conflict in study interpretations.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Epidemiology, Confounding, Measurement error, Selection bias, Sensitivity
English
2008
8
1
29
48
none
Orsini, N., Bellocco, R., Bottai, M., Wolk, A., Greenland, S. (2008). A tool for deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis of epidemiologic studies. THE STATA JOURNAL, 8(1), 29-48 [10.1177/1536867x0800800103].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/26815
Citazioni
  • Scopus 96
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 88
Social impact