In the last years, there is a growing debate on reproducibility and quality of empirical results within the psychological science. In his target article, Massimo Grassi (2018), as many other scholars, argues that psychological science is living a reproducibility crisis and that the only way to overcome it is changing the paradigm. Moving from this view, the present work challenges the thesis of a current reproducibility crisis in psychology. Moreover, it proposes a new perspective concerning reproducibility and quality issues, by looking at two usually overlooked aspects: the epistemological ground of psychological science and the way in which editorial system and careers are organized.
Sulpizio, S., Avanzi, L. (2019). Crisi di riproducibilità o crisi di fiducia?. GIORNALE ITALIANO DI PSICOLOGIA, 46(1-2), 379-392 [10.1421/93797].
Crisi di riproducibilità o crisi di fiducia?
Sulpizio, S.Primo
;
2019
Abstract
In the last years, there is a growing debate on reproducibility and quality of empirical results within the psychological science. In his target article, Massimo Grassi (2018), as many other scholars, argues that psychological science is living a reproducibility crisis and that the only way to overcome it is changing the paradigm. Moving from this view, the present work challenges the thesis of a current reproducibility crisis in psychology. Moreover, it proposes a new perspective concerning reproducibility and quality issues, by looking at two usually overlooked aspects: the epistemological ground of psychological science and the way in which editorial system and careers are organized.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
SulpizioAvanzi_GIP.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia di allegato:
Submitted Version (Pre-print)
Dimensione
160.07 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
160.07 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.