Aims Mortality for cervical cancer varies between the different regions of the world, with high rates in low-income countries where screening programmes are not present and organised. However, increasing screening coverage is still a priority in all countries: one way to do that is to base screening on self-sampled screening. The success of a self-sampling screening strategy depends on capacity to recruit unscreened women, on the performance and acceptability of the device and on the clinical performance of the high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) test. Methods This study based on 786 enrolled women investigates the best cut-off value of Hybrid Capture 2 HPV test (HC2) for self-sampled specimens in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Results In this population, we found that the sensitivity and the specificity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more detection of HC2 performed on self-sampled specimens were 82.5% and 82.8%, respectively considering the relative light units (RLU) cut-off value of 1. Increasing the cut-off value the sensitivity decreases and the specificity raises and the best area under the curve for the RLU cut-off value is 1. Conclusions Our results confirm that the cut-off value of 1 suggested by Qiagen for PreservCyt specimen is the best cut-off value also for self-sampled specimens.

Bottari, F., Igidbashian, S., Boveri, S., Tricca, A., Gulmini, C., Sesia, M., et al. (2017). HPV self-sampling in CIN2+ detection: Sensitivity and specificity of different RLU cut-off of HC2 in specimens from 786 women. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 70(4), 327-330 [10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204044].

HPV self-sampling in CIN2+ detection: Sensitivity and specificity of different RLU cut-off of HC2 in specimens from 786 women

Landoni F.;
2017

Abstract

Aims Mortality for cervical cancer varies between the different regions of the world, with high rates in low-income countries where screening programmes are not present and organised. However, increasing screening coverage is still a priority in all countries: one way to do that is to base screening on self-sampled screening. The success of a self-sampling screening strategy depends on capacity to recruit unscreened women, on the performance and acceptability of the device and on the clinical performance of the high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) test. Methods This study based on 786 enrolled women investigates the best cut-off value of Hybrid Capture 2 HPV test (HC2) for self-sampled specimens in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Results In this population, we found that the sensitivity and the specificity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more detection of HC2 performed on self-sampled specimens were 82.5% and 82.8%, respectively considering the relative light units (RLU) cut-off value of 1. Increasing the cut-off value the sensitivity decreases and the specificity raises and the best area under the curve for the RLU cut-off value is 1. Conclusions Our results confirm that the cut-off value of 1 suggested by Qiagen for PreservCyt specimen is the best cut-off value also for self-sampled specimens.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
CERVICAL CANCER; HPV; LABORATORY TESTS;
CERVICAL CANCER; HPV; LABORATORY TESTS; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Papillomavirus Infections; ROC Curve; Reference Values; Self-Examination; Sensitivity and Specificity; Vaginal Smears; Young Adult
English
2017
70
4
327
330
none
Bottari, F., Igidbashian, S., Boveri, S., Tricca, A., Gulmini, C., Sesia, M., et al. (2017). HPV self-sampling in CIN2+ detection: Sensitivity and specificity of different RLU cut-off of HC2 in specimens from 786 women. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 70(4), 327-330 [10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204044].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/262549
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
Social impact