Purpose To evaluate which respiratory support method for critically ill patients undergoing endotracheal intubation (ETI) is associated with less desaturation. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and CINAHL databases. We included randomized (RCT) and non-randomized (non-RCT) studies investigating any method of respiratory support before/during ETI compared to a reference control. Results Apneic oxygenation (ApOx) was the most commonly investigated respiratory support technique for critically ill patients undergoing intubation (4 RCTs, 358 patients). Three of these studies investigated high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for ApOx while standard nasal cannula was used in one. Globally, ApOx was associated with higher minimum SpO2 value compared to those receiving ETI without ApOx (mean difference 2.31%, 95% CI 0.42 to 4.20, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%) but there were not significant differences between groups in severe hypoxemia and intubation related – complications. Concerning other techniques, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) was compared to bag-valve mask in only one RCT and it reduced the degree of desaturation. Conclusions ApOx was significantly associated with higher minimum SpO2 registered during the intubation procedure. Further studies are needed to increase the number of included patients and demonstrate the benefit of ApOx and of other respiratory support methods (e.g. NIV, HFNC)

Russotto, V., Cortegiani, A., Raineri, S., Gregoretti, C., Giarratano, A. (2017). Respiratory support techniques to avoid desaturation in critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 41, 98-106 [10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.003].

Respiratory support techniques to avoid desaturation in critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Russotto V.
Primo
;
2017

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate which respiratory support method for critically ill patients undergoing endotracheal intubation (ETI) is associated with less desaturation. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and CINAHL databases. We included randomized (RCT) and non-randomized (non-RCT) studies investigating any method of respiratory support before/during ETI compared to a reference control. Results Apneic oxygenation (ApOx) was the most commonly investigated respiratory support technique for critically ill patients undergoing intubation (4 RCTs, 358 patients). Three of these studies investigated high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for ApOx while standard nasal cannula was used in one. Globally, ApOx was associated with higher minimum SpO2 value compared to those receiving ETI without ApOx (mean difference 2.31%, 95% CI 0.42 to 4.20, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%) but there were not significant differences between groups in severe hypoxemia and intubation related – complications. Concerning other techniques, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) was compared to bag-valve mask in only one RCT and it reduced the degree of desaturation. Conclusions ApOx was significantly associated with higher minimum SpO2 registered during the intubation procedure. Further studies are needed to increase the number of included patients and demonstrate the benefit of ApOx and of other respiratory support methods (e.g. NIV, HFNC)
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Airway management; Apneic oxygenation; Endotracheal intubation; Noninvasive ventilation; Oxygen inhalation therapy; Preoxygenation; Cannula; Critical Care; Critical Illness; Databases, Factual; Humans; Hypoxia; Intubation, Intratracheal; Noninvasive Ventilation; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Insufficiency
English
2017
41
98
106
reserved
Russotto, V., Cortegiani, A., Raineri, S., Gregoretti, C., Giarratano, A. (2017). Respiratory support techniques to avoid desaturation in critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 41, 98-106 [10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.003].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
russotto2017.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 987.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
987.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/261097
Citazioni
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
Social impact