A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide (MCP) versus its recent derivative alizapride (ALZ) in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Both drugs were given at a dose of 2 mg/kg i.v. push for 5 doses. A positive response was defined as absence of nausea or emesis, or moderate nausea with one or two emeses per day. Eighty-two patients were evaluable. Forty-two received MCP and 40 received ALZ. A positive response was observed in 54% MCP-treated and 41% ALZ-treated patients. Neurologic toxicity, mainly extrapyramidal disturbances, was the most remarkable adverse side effect; it occurred more frequently in the MCP-treated group (31%) than in the ALZ-treated group (17%). Both drugs were found to be more effective in previously untreated patients and when employed together with steroids. MCP was more effective (52% positive response) than ALZ (41% positive response) in cisplatin-treated patients. To better control drug-induced vomiting, we believe that future trials should evaluate slow i.v. infusion of antiemetic agents and their combination with dexamethasone

Zambetti, M., Bajetta, E., Bidoli, P., Verusio, C. (1985). Antiemetic activity of metoclopramide versus alizapride during cancer chemotherapy. TUMORI, 71(6), 609-614 [10.1177/030089168507100615].

Antiemetic activity of metoclopramide versus alizapride during cancer chemotherapy

Bidoli P;
1985

Abstract

A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide (MCP) versus its recent derivative alizapride (ALZ) in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Both drugs were given at a dose of 2 mg/kg i.v. push for 5 doses. A positive response was defined as absence of nausea or emesis, or moderate nausea with one or two emeses per day. Eighty-two patients were evaluable. Forty-two received MCP and 40 received ALZ. A positive response was observed in 54% MCP-treated and 41% ALZ-treated patients. Neurologic toxicity, mainly extrapyramidal disturbances, was the most remarkable adverse side effect; it occurred more frequently in the MCP-treated group (31%) than in the ALZ-treated group (17%). Both drugs were found to be more effective in previously untreated patients and when employed together with steroids. MCP was more effective (52% positive response) than ALZ (41% positive response) in cisplatin-treated patients. To better control drug-induced vomiting, we believe that future trials should evaluate slow i.v. infusion of antiemetic agents and their combination with dexamethasone
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
metoclopramide
English
1985
71
6
609
614
reserved
Zambetti, M., Bajetta, E., Bidoli, P., Verusio, C. (1985). Antiemetic activity of metoclopramide versus alizapride during cancer chemotherapy. TUMORI, 71(6), 609-614 [10.1177/030089168507100615].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ANTIEMETIC ACTIVITY.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Dimensione 3.87 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.87 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/260648
Citazioni
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
Social impact