Introduction: Despite the large use of nab-paclitaxel as a treatment option in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) across different countries, no definitive data are available in particular clinical situations. Areas covered: Efficacy, safety and schedule issues concerning available literature on nab-paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer and in specific subgroups of patients have been discussed and voted during an International Expert Meeting. Ten expert specialists in oncology, with extensive clinical experience on Nab-P and publications in the field of MBC have been identified. Six scientific areas of interest have been covered, generating 13 specific Statements for Nab-P, after literature review. For efficacy issues, a summary of research quality was performed adopting the GRADE algorithm for evidence scoring. The panel members were invited to express their opinion on the statements, in case of disagreement all the controversial opinions and the relative motivations have been made public. Expert opinion: Consensus was reached in 30.8% of the Nab-P statements, mainly those regarding safety issues, whereas ones regarding efficacy and schedule still remain controversial areas, requiring further data originated by the literature.

Cazzaniga, M., Ciruelos, E., Fabi, A., Garcia-Saenz, J., Lindman, H., Mavroudis, D., et al. (2019). Metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer patients: towards an expert consensus on nab-paclitaxel treatment in HER2-negative tumours—the MACBETH project. CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 83(2), 301-318 [10.1007/s00280-018-3717-2].

Metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer patients: towards an expert consensus on nab-paclitaxel treatment in HER2-negative tumours—the MACBETH project

Cazzaniga M. E.;
2019

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the large use of nab-paclitaxel as a treatment option in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) across different countries, no definitive data are available in particular clinical situations. Areas covered: Efficacy, safety and schedule issues concerning available literature on nab-paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer and in specific subgroups of patients have been discussed and voted during an International Expert Meeting. Ten expert specialists in oncology, with extensive clinical experience on Nab-P and publications in the field of MBC have been identified. Six scientific areas of interest have been covered, generating 13 specific Statements for Nab-P, after literature review. For efficacy issues, a summary of research quality was performed adopting the GRADE algorithm for evidence scoring. The panel members were invited to express their opinion on the statements, in case of disagreement all the controversial opinions and the relative motivations have been made public. Expert opinion: Consensus was reached in 30.8% of the Nab-P statements, mainly those regarding safety issues, whereas ones regarding efficacy and schedule still remain controversial areas, requiring further data originated by the literature.
Articolo in rivista - Review Essay
Breast cancer; Expert meeting; Nab-paclitaxel; Neuropathy; Weekly schedule; Albumins; Breast Neoplasms; Consensus; Female; Humans; Paclitaxel; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Receptor, ErbB-2; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
English
2019
83
2
301
318
reserved
Cazzaniga, M., Ciruelos, E., Fabi, A., Garcia-Saenz, J., Lindman, H., Mavroudis, D., et al. (2019). Metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer patients: towards an expert consensus on nab-paclitaxel treatment in HER2-negative tumours—the MACBETH project. CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 83(2), 301-318 [10.1007/s00280-018-3717-2].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cazzaniga2019_Article_MetastaticOrLocallyAdvancedBre.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 864.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
864.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/259108
Citazioni
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
Social impact