The article discusses the contributions of anthropology to the interdisciplinary dialogues on the scientific status of knowledge and on the relationship between the sciences. It attributes to the discipline a privileged position, founded on the distinctive character of ethnography: the development of a scientific discourse on humankind based on a personal experience. The intense involvements of the ethnographers in the research process and in the relations with their interlocutors - as well as the relativizing and cross-cultural disciplinary outlook - question the neutrality that other sciences idealize or can more easily take for granted and challenge the ideals of objectivity. The paper intends to contribute to the epistemological debate and to the understanding of the social role of science. It proposes the notion of objectivation (i.e. the study of the condition of the constitutions of scientific objects) to think the relations among

Malighetti, R. (2019). The plural unification of sciences: the epistemological contributions of a perpetually dissatisfied discipline. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY, 3(1), 1-19 [10.1186/s41257-019-0016-8].

The plural unification of sciences: the epistemological contributions of a perpetually dissatisfied discipline

Malighetti, R
2019

Abstract

The article discusses the contributions of anthropology to the interdisciplinary dialogues on the scientific status of knowledge and on the relationship between the sciences. It attributes to the discipline a privileged position, founded on the distinctive character of ethnography: the development of a scientific discourse on humankind based on a personal experience. The intense involvements of the ethnographers in the research process and in the relations with their interlocutors - as well as the relativizing and cross-cultural disciplinary outlook - question the neutrality that other sciences idealize or can more easily take for granted and challenge the ideals of objectivity. The paper intends to contribute to the epistemological debate and to the understanding of the social role of science. It proposes the notion of objectivation (i.e. the study of the condition of the constitutions of scientific objects) to think the relations among
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Anthropology · Epistemology · Method · Objectivity · Subjectivity · Objectivation · Interdisciplinary dialogue
English
14-feb-2019
2019
3
1
1
19
partially_open
Malighetti, R. (2019). The plural unification of sciences: the epistemological contributions of a perpetually dissatisfied discipline. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY, 3(1), 1-19 [10.1186/s41257-019-0016-8].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10281-259014.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 556.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
556.46 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
The plural unification sciences.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 455.15 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
455.15 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/259014
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact