We examined the development of stress assignment in reading Italian aloud. We investigated frequency effects as a marker of the use of item-specific lexical knowledge in assigning stress together with stress dominance and stress neighbourhood (the number of words sharing both stress and ending) as markers of distributional information regarding properties of the lexicon extracted from spoken language. We tested second- and fourth-graders in a reading-aloud experiment including high- and low-frequency words and nonwords. Results show that despite the regularity of orthography-phonology mappings in Italian and the predominant use of phonological recoding procedures, item-specific lexical knowledge is also used, even by beginning readers. The frequency effect was significant and did not increase with age, while stress errors on low-frequency words decreased with increasing grade. Stress neighbourhood increasingly affected stress assignment on nonwords with older children. Taken together, our findings show that both item-specific knowledge and general information about stress distribution are relevant in children's reading, suggesting the simultaneous use of both lexical and sublexical information. Moreover, as the reading system develops, and knowledge about the relative distribution of stress neighbourhood increases, larger grain-size units are also exploited

Sulpizio, S., Colombo, L. (2013). Lexical stress, frequency and stress neighborhood effects in the early stages of Italian reading development. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 66(10), 2073-2084 [10.1080/17470218.2013.785577].

Lexical stress, frequency and stress neighborhood effects in the early stages of Italian reading development

Sulpizio, S
;
2013

Abstract

We examined the development of stress assignment in reading Italian aloud. We investigated frequency effects as a marker of the use of item-specific lexical knowledge in assigning stress together with stress dominance and stress neighbourhood (the number of words sharing both stress and ending) as markers of distributional information regarding properties of the lexicon extracted from spoken language. We tested second- and fourth-graders in a reading-aloud experiment including high- and low-frequency words and nonwords. Results show that despite the regularity of orthography-phonology mappings in Italian and the predominant use of phonological recoding procedures, item-specific lexical knowledge is also used, even by beginning readers. The frequency effect was significant and did not increase with age, while stress errors on low-frequency words decreased with increasing grade. Stress neighbourhood increasingly affected stress assignment on nonwords with older children. Taken together, our findings show that both item-specific knowledge and general information about stress distribution are relevant in children's reading, suggesting the simultaneous use of both lexical and sublexical information. Moreover, as the reading system develops, and knowledge about the relative distribution of stress neighbourhood increases, larger grain-size units are also exploited
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
lexical stress; reading development; stress dominance; stress neighborhood; word frequency
English
2013
66
10
2073
2084
reserved
Sulpizio, S., Colombo, L. (2013). Lexical stress, frequency and stress neighborhood effects in the early stages of Italian reading development. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 66(10), 2073-2084 [10.1080/17470218.2013.785577].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SulpizioColombo_Final.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Author’s Accepted Manuscript, AAM (Post-print)
Dimensione 168.39 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
168.39 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/250130
Citazioni
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
Social impact