BACKGROUND: Major depression (MD) is currently viewed as a heterogeneous condition, characterized by different psychopathological dimensions. METHODS: Our sample was composed of 1,289 nonpsychotic bipolar/unipolar depressed patients. Participants were divided into mixed (MXD), melancholic (MEL), and anxious (ANX) depressed, according to a hierarchical functional model. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were compared across depressive subtypes by chi(2) test and analysis of variance. The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and 2 subscales (melancholic [MEL-S] and psychic-somatic anxiety [PSOM-ANX]) from the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale also served as continuous outcome measures. RESULTS: MXD patients more frequently had bipolar I disorder (BD I), younger age of onset, and a higher familial load for mood disorders. MEL and ANX patients were more frequently diagnosed with major depressive disorder and reported a higher suicide risk. YMRS scores in depression were associated with BD I diagnosis (P < .0001) and manic polarity of the last episode (P < .0001), while a depressive polarity of the last episode (P <.0001) was associated with higher MEL-S score. No specific predictor was associated with PSOM-ANX score. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings suggest that mixed depressive features are associated with significant hallmarks of bipolarity, and melancholic features may be influenced by previous depressive polarity. The symptom domain of anxiety appears to have no specific predictor.

Zaninotto, L., Souery, D., Calati, R., Scudellari, P., Janiri, L., Montgomery, S., et al. (2014). Mixed, melancholic, and anxious features in depression: A cross-sectional study of sociodemographic and clinical correlates. ANNALS OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 26(4), 243-253.

Mixed, melancholic, and anxious features in depression: A cross-sectional study of sociodemographic and clinical correlates

Calati R;
2014

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major depression (MD) is currently viewed as a heterogeneous condition, characterized by different psychopathological dimensions. METHODS: Our sample was composed of 1,289 nonpsychotic bipolar/unipolar depressed patients. Participants were divided into mixed (MXD), melancholic (MEL), and anxious (ANX) depressed, according to a hierarchical functional model. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were compared across depressive subtypes by chi(2) test and analysis of variance. The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and 2 subscales (melancholic [MEL-S] and psychic-somatic anxiety [PSOM-ANX]) from the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale also served as continuous outcome measures. RESULTS: MXD patients more frequently had bipolar I disorder (BD I), younger age of onset, and a higher familial load for mood disorders. MEL and ANX patients were more frequently diagnosed with major depressive disorder and reported a higher suicide risk. YMRS scores in depression were associated with BD I diagnosis (P < .0001) and manic polarity of the last episode (P < .0001), while a depressive polarity of the last episode (P <.0001) was associated with higher MEL-S score. No specific predictor was associated with PSOM-ANX score. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings suggest that mixed depressive features are associated with significant hallmarks of bipolarity, and melancholic features may be influenced by previous depressive polarity. The symptom domain of anxiety appears to have no specific predictor.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
mixed, agitated, melancholic, anxious, depression
English
2014
26
4
243
253
none
Zaninotto, L., Souery, D., Calati, R., Scudellari, P., Janiri, L., Montgomery, S., et al. (2014). Mixed, melancholic, and anxious features in depression: A cross-sectional study of sociodemographic and clinical correlates. ANNALS OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 26(4), 243-253.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/249264
Citazioni
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
Social impact