Background: Depression is common in the elderly and in the last few years this led to a significant increase in antidepressant prescription rates. However, little is known about antidepressant efficacy profile in relation with socio-demographic and clinical features in this population. The aim of the present study was to define the most suitable socio-demographic and clinical profile for the use of antidepressant treatments in late-life depression. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on efficacy of antidepressants of all classes in major depressed elderly subjects (> 60 years old). Reviews and meta-analyses focusing on this topic have been considered as well. Thirty-four RCTs were included and socio-demographic and clinical features were investigated via meta-regression analysis as moderators of efficacy measures (standardized mean difference based on Hamilton Depressive Rating Scale and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale). Results: A lower rate of response to antidepressants of all classes was found in patients of male gender, of older age, and with a longer mean duration of the current episode. On the contrary, a higher rate of response was found in patients with a higher baseline severity and at their first episode of illness. Subsamples treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors alone yielded similar results. Limitations: RCTs only have been included. Conclusions: A number of socio-demographic and clinical features have been found to moderate antidepressant efficacy in elderly population. Those variables could help clinicians for a more individualized treatment. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Calati, R., Signorelli, M., Balestri, M., Marsano, A., De Ronchi, D., Aguglia, E., et al. (2013). Antidepressants in elderly: Metaregression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 147(1-3), 1-8 [10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.053].

Antidepressants in elderly: Metaregression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials

Calati R;
2013

Abstract

Background: Depression is common in the elderly and in the last few years this led to a significant increase in antidepressant prescription rates. However, little is known about antidepressant efficacy profile in relation with socio-demographic and clinical features in this population. The aim of the present study was to define the most suitable socio-demographic and clinical profile for the use of antidepressant treatments in late-life depression. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on efficacy of antidepressants of all classes in major depressed elderly subjects (> 60 years old). Reviews and meta-analyses focusing on this topic have been considered as well. Thirty-four RCTs were included and socio-demographic and clinical features were investigated via meta-regression analysis as moderators of efficacy measures (standardized mean difference based on Hamilton Depressive Rating Scale and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale). Results: A lower rate of response to antidepressants of all classes was found in patients of male gender, of older age, and with a longer mean duration of the current episode. On the contrary, a higher rate of response was found in patients with a higher baseline severity and at their first episode of illness. Subsamples treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors alone yielded similar results. Limitations: RCTs only have been included. Conclusions: A number of socio-demographic and clinical features have been found to moderate antidepressant efficacy in elderly population. Those variables could help clinicians for a more individualized treatment. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Older, Elderly, Depression, Antidepressant, Effectiveness, Clinic profile
English
2013
147
1-3
1
8
none
Calati, R., Signorelli, M., Balestri, M., Marsano, A., De Ronchi, D., Aguglia, E., et al. (2013). Antidepressants in elderly: Metaregression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 147(1-3), 1-8 [10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.053].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/249256
Citazioni
  • Scopus 65
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 61
Social impact