The chapter deals with the rapid increase of administrative activities in the Italian higher education system as well as in its individual university with relevant consequences on the level of bureaucratization of the academic life. The Italian system of higher education – traditionally belonging to the Humboldtian model – is characterized by an unstable but substantial role of the state. In recent decades the degree of autonomy granted to the universities went up and down while the increasing amount of rules produced more bureaucracy. The introduction of the assessment policy enacted through the Agency for Quality Assurance (ANVUR) contributed to a growing amount of rules and regulation. At the same time, the juridification of the assessment processes demonstrated the confusion between the administrative/technical rules and the political will in controlling the universities’ autonomy. Meanwhile, the attempt to create a structure of governance at the level of individual university more suited with the competition among universities produced resistances from the traditional representation of scientific areas, while the growing relevance of the internal administration gave rise to a higher level of bureaucratization.

Marra, A., Moscati, R. (2020). Politicians and bureaucrats in a Humboldt type system: the case of Italy. In Responsibility of Higher Education Systems What? How? Why? (pp.93-108). Brill [10.1163/9789004436558_006].

Politicians and bureaucrats in a Humboldt type system: the case of Italy

Marra A;Moscati R.
2020

Abstract

The chapter deals with the rapid increase of administrative activities in the Italian higher education system as well as in its individual university with relevant consequences on the level of bureaucratization of the academic life. The Italian system of higher education – traditionally belonging to the Humboldtian model – is characterized by an unstable but substantial role of the state. In recent decades the degree of autonomy granted to the universities went up and down while the increasing amount of rules produced more bureaucracy. The introduction of the assessment policy enacted through the Agency for Quality Assurance (ANVUR) contributed to a growing amount of rules and regulation. At the same time, the juridification of the assessment processes demonstrated the confusion between the administrative/technical rules and the political will in controlling the universities’ autonomy. Meanwhile, the attempt to create a structure of governance at the level of individual university more suited with the competition among universities produced resistances from the traditional representation of scientific areas, while the growing relevance of the internal administration gave rise to a higher level of bureaucratization.
paper
globalization; Italian higher education system; quality assurance; state bureaucracy; university autonomy;
English
Responsibility of Higher Education Systems: What? Why? How? - The 41st EAIR Forum
2019
Bruno Broucker, Victor Borden, Ton Kallenberg & Clare Milsom
Responsibility of Higher Education Systems What? How? Why?
9789004436541
2020
1
93
108
https://brill.com/display/title/58360
none
Marra, A., Moscati, R. (2020). Politicians and bureaucrats in a Humboldt type system: the case of Italy. In Responsibility of Higher Education Systems What? How? Why? (pp.93-108). Brill [10.1163/9789004436558_006].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/249202
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact