Research on inconsistency-tolerant query answering usually assumes that the terminological knowledge is correct, and only the facts (ABox) need to be repaired. In this paper we study the problem of answering instance queries over inconsistent ontologies, by repairing the whole knowledge base (KB). Contrary to ABox repairs, when KB repairs are considered, instance checking in DL-LiteHorn w.r.t. the brave semantics remains tractable, and the intersection semantics allow for an anytime algorithm. We also show that inconsistency-tolerant instance checking w.r.t. ABox repairs is intractable even if only polynomially many ABox repairs exist.

Peñaloza, R. (2017). Inconsistency-tolerant instance checking in tractable description logics. In Rules and Reasoning: International Joint Conference, RuleML+RR 2017, (pp.215-229). Springer Verlag [10.1007/978-3-319-61252-2_15].

Inconsistency-tolerant instance checking in tractable description logics

Peñaloza, R
2017

Abstract

Research on inconsistency-tolerant query answering usually assumes that the terminological knowledge is correct, and only the facts (ABox) need to be repaired. In this paper we study the problem of answering instance queries over inconsistent ontologies, by repairing the whole knowledge base (KB). Contrary to ABox repairs, when KB repairs are considered, instance checking in DL-LiteHorn w.r.t. the brave semantics remains tractable, and the intersection semantics allow for an anytime algorithm. We also show that inconsistency-tolerant instance checking w.r.t. ABox repairs is intractable even if only polynomially many ABox repairs exist.
paper
error-tolerant reasoning, description logics, instance checking
English
International Joint Conference on Rules and Reasoning, RuleML+RR 2017
2017
Van Woensel, W; Franconi, E; Costantini, S; Roman, D; Kontchakov, R; Sadri, F
Rules and Reasoning: International Joint Conference, RuleML+RR 2017,
9783319612515
2017
10364
215
229
open
Peñaloza, R. (2017). Inconsistency-tolerant instance checking in tractable description logics. In Rules and Reasoning: International Joint Conference, RuleML+RR 2017, (pp.215-229). Springer Verlag [10.1007/978-3-319-61252-2_15].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pena17.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Submitted Version (Pre-print)
Dimensione 362.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
362.04 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/233839
Citazioni
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
Social impact