Abstract: We perform a comparison of soft-gluon resummation in SCET vs. direct QCD (dQCD), using Higgs boson production in gluon fusion as a case study, with the goal of tracing the quantitative impact of each source of difference between the two approaches. We show that saddle-point methods enable a direct quantitative comparison despite the fact that the scale which is resummed in the two approaches is not the same. As a byproduct, we put in one-to-one analytic correspondence various features of either approach: specifically, we show how the SCET method for treating the Landau pole can be implemented in dQCD, and how the resummation of the optimal partonic scale of dQCD can be implemented in SCET. We conclude that the main quantitative difference comes from power-suppressed subleading contributions, which could in fact be freely tuned in either approach, and not really characteristic of either. This conclusion holds for Higgs production in gluon fusion, but it is in fact generic for processes with similar kinematics. For Higgs production, everything else being equal, SCET resummation at NNLL in the Becher-Neubert implementation leads to essentially no enhancement of the NNLO cross-section, unlike dQCD in the standard implementation of Catani et al.

Bonvini, M., Forte, S., Ridolfi, G., & Rottoli, L. (2015). Resummation prescriptions and ambiguities in SCET vs. direct QCD: Higgs production as a case study. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2015(1) [10.1007/JHEP01(2015)046].

Resummation prescriptions and ambiguities in SCET vs. direct QCD: Higgs production as a case study

Rottoli, L
2015

Abstract

Abstract: We perform a comparison of soft-gluon resummation in SCET vs. direct QCD (dQCD), using Higgs boson production in gluon fusion as a case study, with the goal of tracing the quantitative impact of each source of difference between the two approaches. We show that saddle-point methods enable a direct quantitative comparison despite the fact that the scale which is resummed in the two approaches is not the same. As a byproduct, we put in one-to-one analytic correspondence various features of either approach: specifically, we show how the SCET method for treating the Landau pole can be implemented in dQCD, and how the resummation of the optimal partonic scale of dQCD can be implemented in SCET. We conclude that the main quantitative difference comes from power-suppressed subleading contributions, which could in fact be freely tuned in either approach, and not really characteristic of either. This conclusion holds for Higgs production in gluon fusion, but it is in fact generic for processes with similar kinematics. For Higgs production, everything else being equal, SCET resummation at NNLL in the Becher-Neubert implementation leads to essentially no enhancement of the NNLO cross-section, unlike dQCD in the standard implementation of Catani et al.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Scientifica
SCET, QCD, Resummation
English
Bonvini, M., Forte, S., Ridolfi, G., & Rottoli, L. (2015). Resummation prescriptions and ambiguities in SCET vs. direct QCD: Higgs production as a case study. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2015(1) [10.1007/JHEP01(2015)046].
Bonvini, M; Forte, S; Ridolfi, G; Rottoli, L
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10281/229867
Citazioni
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 31
Social impact