Comparing the impact of different types of credit on households' investment in Bangladesh, we find that loans from microfinance institutions are likely to be channeled toward non-agricultural activities while both informal and bank lending are associated to a higher expenditure in agricultural inputs. Estimated effects are net of the differences in the amount borrowed, interest rates, and collateral. Results suggest that features which are specific to microfinance-such as tight repayment schedules and land-based eligibility rules-may reduce the suitability of this source of funds for the farming sector

DALLA PELLEGRINA, L. (2011). Microfinance and Investment: A Comparison with Bank and Informal Lending. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 39(6), 882-897 [10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.03.002].

Microfinance and Investment: A Comparison with Bank and Informal Lending

DALLA PELLEGRINA, LUCIA
2011

Abstract

Comparing the impact of different types of credit on households' investment in Bangladesh, we find that loans from microfinance institutions are likely to be channeled toward non-agricultural activities while both informal and bank lending are associated to a higher expenditure in agricultural inputs. Estimated effects are net of the differences in the amount borrowed, interest rates, and collateral. Results suggest that features which are specific to microfinance-such as tight repayment schedules and land-based eligibility rules-may reduce the suitability of this source of funds for the farming sector
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Microfinance, Banks, Informal lending, Investment
English
2011
39
6
882
897
none
DALLA PELLEGRINA, L. (2011). Microfinance and Investment: A Comparison with Bank and Informal Lending. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 39(6), 882-897 [10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.03.002].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/22678
Citazioni
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 31
Social impact