We propose a family of mimetic discretization schemes for elliptic problems including convection and reaction terms. Our approach is an extension of the mimetic methodology for purely diffusive problems on unstructured polygonal and polyhedral meshes. The a priori error analysis relies on the connection between the mimetic formulation and the lowest order Raviart–Thomas mixed finite element method. The theoretical results are confirmed by numerical experiments.

Cangiani, A., Manzini, G., Russo, A. (2009). Convergence analysis of the mimetic finite difference method for elliptic problems. SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 47(4), 2612 [10.1137/080717560].

Convergence analysis of the mimetic finite difference method for elliptic problems

CANGIANI, ANDREA;RUSSO, ALESSANDRO
2009

Abstract

We propose a family of mimetic discretization schemes for elliptic problems including convection and reaction terms. Our approach is an extension of the mimetic methodology for purely diffusive problems on unstructured polygonal and polyhedral meshes. The a priori error analysis relies on the connection between the mimetic formulation and the lowest order Raviart–Thomas mixed finite element method. The theoretical results are confirmed by numerical experiments.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
mimetic finite difference method, boundary value problem, diffusion-convection-reaction equation, Raviart–Thomas finite element space, dual mixed formulation, polyhedral mesh
English
2009
47
4
2612
none
Cangiani, A., Manzini, G., Russo, A. (2009). Convergence analysis of the mimetic finite difference method for elliptic problems. SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 47(4), 2612 [10.1137/080717560].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/22662
Citazioni
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 52
Social impact